Genotype x environment interaction and genotype evaluation for yield, yield components and qualities in sugarcane (Saccharum Spp.), Ethiopia

Publish Year: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 18

This Paper With 17 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_SJCS-7-1_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 7 اسفند 1402

Abstract:

The presence of genotype x environment interaction (GEI) and the limited knowledge on the relationships among production environments complicate selection of superior varieties in sugarcane. For this reason, studying about the nature of GEI, genotype evaluation and classification of the production environments in to distinct mega environments is very important in sugarcane breeding program. The study was conducted to investigate the nature of genotype x environment interaction, classify environments in to mega environments and evaluate genotypes based on yield performance and stability. Forty-three genotypes along with six standard varieties were evaluated across location and over crop years using simple lattice design. Data of cane yield, cane yield components and yield qualities were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results from ANOVA declared the importance of GEI under Ethiopian agro climatic conditions. When the data was analyzed using the GE model, the f-values were inflated and the genetic variation was under estimated. Thus, for multi-environment trials conducted across locations and over seasons, data analysis based on the GLC model would be appropriate. The genotype + genotype x environment interaction (GGE) bi-plots divided the target environment in to distinct mega environments where a repeatable genotype x location interaction was observed for recoverable sucrose% and sugar yields. Moreover, GGE bi-plots identified introduced genotypes that have better broad and specific adaptations than the commercial varieties and can be commercially exploited according to their respective regional niche. Moreover, we recommend a breeding strategy for specific adaptation in future sugarcane breeding programs in EthiopiaThe presence of genotype x environment interaction (GEI) and the limited knowledge on the relationships among production environments complicate selection of superior varieties in sugarcane. For this reason, studying about the nature of GEI, genotype evaluation and classification of the production environments in to distinct mega environments is very important in sugarcane breeding program. The study was conducted to investigate the nature of genotype x environment interaction, classify environments in to mega environments and evaluate genotypes based on yield performance and stability. Forty-three genotypes along with six standard varieties were evaluated across location and over crop years using simple lattice design. Data of cane yield, cane yield components and yield qualities were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results from ANOVA declared the importance of GEI under Ethiopian agro climatic conditions. When the data was analyzed using the GE model, the f-values were inflated and the genetic variation was under estimated. Thus, for multi-environment trials conducted across locations and over seasons, data analysis based on the GLC model would be appropriate. The genotype + genotype x environment interaction (GGE) bi-plots divided the target environment in to distinct mega environments where a repeatable genotype x location interaction was observed for recoverable sucrose% and sugar yields. Moreover, GGE bi-plots identified introduced genotypes that have better broad and specific adaptations than the commercial varieties and can be commercially exploited according to their respective regional niche. Moreover, we recommend a breeding strategy for specific adaptation in future sugarcane breeding programs in Ethiopia

Authors

Mebrahtom Ftwi

Ethiopian Sugar Corporation, Research and Development Center, Wonji, Ethiopia

Firew Mekbib

Haramaya University, P.O. Box ۱۳۸, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia

Eyasu Abraha

Tigray Agricultural Research Institute, P.O. Box ۴۹۲, Mekelle, Ethiopia

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Alarmelu, S., Balakrishnan, R., Hemaprabha, G., 2015. GxE interaction studies ...
  • Barry, G.A., Kang, M.S., 2008. Location contributions determined via GGE ...
  • Berg, V., 1972. Control of the cane sugar manufacture. Manual ...
  • Esayas, T., Firew, M., Amsalu, A., 2016. Correlation and path ...
  • Feyissa, T., Negi, T., Abiy, G., Zinaw, D., Netsanet, A., ...
  • Ftwi, M., Mekbib, F., Abraha, E., 2017. Temporal and spatial ...
  • Gauch, H.G., Zobel, R.W., 1997. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. ...
  • Jin, S.Q., Xu, N.Y., 2012. The discussion of necessity about ...
  • Khan, I.A., Seema, N., Raza, S., Yasmine, S., 2013. Environmental ...
  • Kimbeng, C.A., Zhou, M.M., da Silva, J.A., 2009. Genotype x ...
  • Luo, J., Pan, Y., Que, Y., Zhang, H., Grisham, M.P., ...
  • Luo, J., Yong-Bao, P., liping, X., Michael, P.G., Hua, Z., ...
  • Mebrahtom, F., 2017. Genotype x environment interaction, in vitro screening ...
  • Mulema, J.M.K., Adipala, E., Olanya, O.M., Wagoire, W., 2008. Yield ...
  • Payne, R., Murray, D., Harding, S., Baird, D., Soutar, D., ...
  • Ramburan, S., 2012. The nature and causes of sugarcane genotype ...
  • Ramburan, S., 2014. A multivariate illustration and interpretation of non-repeatable ...
  • Ramburan, S., Zhou, M., 2011. Investigating sugarcane genotype by environment ...
  • Rea, R., de Sousa-Vieira, O., 2002. Genotype x environment interactions ...
  • Sandhu, K.S., Brar, S., Singh, R.S., Singh, P., Bhagatand, I., ...
  • Statistical Analysis System Institute, SAS Users Guide; Version 9.2. 2009. ...
  • Tahir, M., Khalil, H.I., Mc Cord, P.H., Barry, G., 2014. ...
  • Vargas, M., Combs, E., Alvarado, G., Gary, G., Mathews, K., ...
  • Yan, W., 2001. GGE bi-plot. A windows application for graphical ...
  • Yan, W., Kang, M.S., 2003. GGE bi-plot analysis: A graphical ...
  • Yan, W., Pageau, D., Frégeau-Reid, J.A., Durand, J., 2011. Assessing ...
  • Yan, W., Tinker, N.A., 2005. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial ...
  • Yan, W.K., 2010. Optimal use of bi-plots in analysis of ...
  • Zhou, M., 2015. Influence of locations and seasons and their ...
  • Zhou, M., Joshi, S., Martnez, T., Koberstein, H., 2011. Components ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع