Regulative Discourse for Pre-Schoolers: Should English Language Teachers Be Polite?

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 22

This Paper With 16 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_RALS-13-2_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 اردیبهشت 1403

Abstract:

This study aims to contribute to the research literature on politeness in language teachers’ requestive behaviour. More specifically, it adopts a multilingual approach to explore teachers’ politeness strategies in the English for Young Learners (EYL) classroom, an underresearched instructional setting where regulative discourse tends to predominate. Participants are two pre-school teachers and two intact groups of ۴/۵-year-old children. ۱,۹۴۲ procedural and disciplinary directives in six video-recorded lessons are processed from a discourse-pragmatic perspective centred on directness, modifiers, and person deixis. The emerging syntactic and sequential design of regulative discourse seems to respond to factors like activity type and differing understandings of classroom power relations or deontic stances (Stevanovic, ۲۰۱۱). Results can serve as an awareness-raising exercise useful to draw attention to the need of strengthening practitioners’ pragmatic sensitivity in teacher training.

Keywords:

Politeness , Regulative Discourse , Teacher Directives , Requests , Early Foreign Language Learning , English for Young Learners (EYL)

Authors

Otilia Martí

Department of Pedagogy, Didactics of Social Sciences, Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain

Laura Portolés

Department of English Studies, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Alcón, E., Safont, M. P., & Martínez-Flor, A. (۲۰۰۵). Towards ...
  • Arnold, J. (۲۰۱۹). The importance of affect in language learning. ...
  • Burdelski, M. (۲۰۱۰). Socializing politeness routines: Action, other-orientation, and embodiment ...
  • Christie, F. (۲۰۰۰). The language of classroom interaction and learning. ...
  • Dalton-Puffer, C. (۲۰۰۵). Negotiating interpersonal meanings in naturalistic classroom discourse: ...
  • Dalton-Puffer, C. & Nikula, T. (۲۰۰۶). Pragmatics of content-based instruction: ...
  • Ellis, K. (۲۰۰۴). The impact of perceived teacher confirmation on ...
  • Gardner, R. (۲۰۱۹). Classroom interaction research: The state of the ...
  • Glaser, K. (۲۰۱۸). Enhancing the role of pragmatics in primary ...
  • He, A. W. (۲۰۰۰). The grammatical and interactional organization of ...
  • He, A. W. (۲۰۰۴a). Identity construction in Chinese heritage language ...
  • He, A. W. (۲۰۰۴b). CA for SLA: Arguments from the ...
  • Iedema, R. (۱۹۹۶). ‘Save the talk for after the listening’: ...
  • Kasper, G. (۲۰۰۶). Speech acts in interaction: Towards discursive pragmatics. ...
  • Khanjani, A., Vahdany, F., & Jafarigohar, M. (۲۰۱۷). EFL teacher ...
  • Macbeth, D. H. (۱۹۹۱). Teacher authority as practical action. Linguistics ...
  • Mercer, S. & Gkonou, C. (۲۰۲۰). Relationships and good language ...
  • Mushin, I., Gardner, R., & Gourlay, C. (۲۰۱۹). Preparing for ...
  • Nikolov, M. & Mihaljevic Djigunovic, J. (۲۰۱۱). All shades of ...
  • Pujiastuti, R. T. (۲۰۱۳). Classroom interaction: an analysis of teacher ...
  • Rich, S. (۲۰۱۴). Taking stock: Where are we now with ...
  • Searle, J. R. (۱۹۹۹). Mind, language and society: Philosophy in ...
  • Stevanovic, M. (۲۰۱۱). Participants’ deontic rights and action formation: The ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع