(Non)native Language Teachers’ Cognitions: Are They Dichotomous?
Publish place: Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics، Vol: 7، Issue: 1
Publish Year: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 10
This Paper With 27 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_RALS-7-1_001
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 اردیبهشت 1403
Abstract:
In view of native/nonnative language teacher dichotomy, different characteristics have been assigned to these ۲ groups. The dichotomy has been the source of different actions and measures to clarify the positive and negative points of being (non)native teachers. In recent years, many researchers have revisited this dichotomy. The challenge to the dichotomy can be a source of motivation to explore if (non)native language teachers’ cognitions or belief systems are different. To this end, this study compared the (non)native language teachers’ perceptions of their cognition in view of their gender and teaching experience. A cognition questionnaire was administered to ۶۶ nonnative and ۴۶ native language teachers, and then an interview was conducted electronically. A total of ۱۲ nonnative and ۸ native teachers responded to the interview questions. Results showed a significant convergence between the (non)native language teachers’ cognitions. Findings also revealed that the (non)native teachers held different beliefs about the nature of language learning and the role of materials in language learning/teaching. As to the teachers’ gender and teaching experience, it was found that the male (non)native teachers and the low-experienced (non)native teachers showed no significant differences, whereas the female (non)native teachers and the high-experienced (non)native participants differed regarding their perceptions of their cognition. Accordingly, (non)native language teachers’ dichotomy might need to be revisited in many respects.
Authors
Zia Tajeddin Tajeddin
Allameh Tabataba’i University
Hossein Askari
Allameh Tabataba’i University
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :