Poring Over Metadiscourse Use in Discussion and Conclusion Sections of Academic Articles Written by Iranian ESP Students
Publish place: Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics، Vol: 8، Issue: 1
Publish Year: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 28
This Paper With 13 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_RALS-8-1_007
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 اردیبهشت 1403
Abstract:
This study investigated the employment of interactional metadisocurse in English academic articles written by Iranian ESP students. Data consisted of a total of ۶۶ academic articles written in English by nonhumanities and humanities writers. Discussion and Conclusion sections were extracted, and Hyland’s (۲۰۰۵) taxonomy was borrowed for analysis. The use of hedges, boosters, and attitude markers was compared in the articles. Total number of each metadiscourse marker was counted, and the differences were checked running Mann-Whitney U test. Analysis revealed that there were disciplinary differences in the use of markers by nonhumanities and humanities. Hedges and attitude markers were more frequent in the humanities’ articles, rather than the nonhumanities’ articles. Also, the use of hedges and boosters was statistically significant. Pedagogical implications are discussed in light of the empirical data.
Keywords:
Authors
Abdullah Sarani
University of Sistan and Baluchestan
Hooshang Khoshsima
Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar,Iran.
Mehri Izadi
English Language Department, Chabahar Maritime University
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :