Immunological Response and Nutritional Effects of Lactobacillus spp.-fermented Garlic on Turkey Broilers

Publish Year: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 28

This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ARCHRAZI-79-2_013

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 اردیبهشت 1403

Abstract:

In the era of free antibiotics used in animal production, the application of feed additives should be prioritized to improve poultry health and production. This study was conducted to evaluate the influences of garlic fermented by Lactobacillus spp. on the growth rate, intestinal microorganisms, and immune response of turkey broilers. A completely randomised design was used, involving ۹۰ turkey broilers aged ۱–۵۶ days, with five treatments and three replicates per treatment. The birds were given feed and water ad libitum for entire the experiment period. The treatments included the supplement of aqueous extract from fermented garlic (FG) to drinking water. The results showed that broilers supplemented with ۰.۸% FG exhibited the largest final body weight (۱,۱۵۸ g/bird), body weight gain (۱۹.۶۴ g/bird/day), and significantly improved feed conversion ratio (۱.۹۶۲) while decreased the feed intake of turkey broilers from to ۱–۵۶ days. The immune organ indices including the spleen, thymus, and bursa of Fabricius indices were increased in the treatment of ۰.۶% FG (P<۰.۰۵) while antibody titres (at ۲۸ and ۴۲ days of age) were improved in the ۰.۶% and ۰.۸% FG treatment (P<۰.۰۵). Clostridium perfringens and Salmonella spp. were not detected in the intestines of these birds, while the amount of Escherichia coli was reduced (P<۰.۰۵) and Lactobacillus spp. increased (P>۰.۰۵) without a significant effect. It can be concluded that supplementation with ۰.۸% FG improved growth performance, and ۰.۶% FG may enhance the immunity of turkeys. The use of ۰.۶ and ۰.۸% FG could be widely applied for poultry production.

Authors

Nguyen Hoang Qui

Department of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh City, Vietnam

Nguyen Linh

Department of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh City, Vietnam

Nguyen Thu

Department of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh City, Vietnam

Kim Nang

Department of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh City, Vietnam

Phong Nhan Hoai

Department of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh City, Vietnam

Bui Nhat Minh

Department of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh City, Vietnam

Nguyen Tu Tai

Department of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh City, Vietnam

Do Duc Luc

Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, Vietnam

Agung Triatmojo

Department of Livestock Socioeconomics, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia