Argument from Design Based on the Calculus of Probabilities

Publish Year: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 32

This Paper With 9 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JCIS-6-2_008

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 27 تیر 1403

Abstract:

One of the premises of the argument from design is the need for the order of a designer. This premise has been explained in various ways, one of which is the calculus of probabilities. It posits that the likelihood of an ordered thing coming into existence by chance is so low that human beings consider it nearly impossible; therefore, this order requires an intelligent designer. However, some contemporary Muslim philosophers, such as Ayatollah Jawādī Āmulī, along with certain Western philosophers, have contested the validity of the calculus of probabilities. They argue that the calculus of probabilities does not reveal reality but is merely practically useful. They assert that undesigned states have the same probability as designed states. In this article, I address these objections, refute them, and ultimately demonstrate the soundness of the argument from design based on the calculus of probabilities.

Authors

Seyyed Jaaber Mousavirad

Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Ayatollahy, H. (۲۰۱۳), Contemporay Religious Studies A Critical Approach (in ...
  • Behe, M. (۲۰۰۶), The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. London, n.p ...
  • Collins, R. (۲۰۰۴), «The Teleological Argument». In Rationality of Theism, ...
  • Dawkins, R. (۲۰۰۶), The God Delusion. Sydney, Bantam press ...
  • Dembski, W. (۲۰۰۵), The Design Inference Eliminating Chance through Small ...
  • Evans, S. (۲۰۱۰), Natural Signs and Knowledge of God. Oxford, ...
  • Gillies, D. (۲۰۰۶), Philosophical Theories of Probability. London and New ...
  • Hume, D. (۲۰۰۷), Dialogues concerning Natural Religion. UK, Cambridg ...
  • Jawādī Āmulī, ʻA. (۲۰۱۱), Explanation of the Arguments for God ...
  • John Barrow, F.T. (۱۹۸۶), The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. New York, ...
  • Manson, N.A. (۲۰۰۳), God and Design. London and New York, ...
  • Mesbah Yazdi, M.T. (۱۹۹۹), Philosophical Instructions.USA, Binghamton University and Brigham ...
  • Motahhari, M. (۲۰۰۳), Collection of the Works of Motahari (in ...
  • Nagel, T. (۲۰۱۲), Mind and Cosmos. USA, Oxford University Press ...
  • Plantinga, A. (۲۰۰۲), «The Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism». In Naturalism ...
  • Pojman, L.P. (۲۰۰۰), What Can We Know. United State, Wadsworth ...
  • Ramin, F. (۲۰۱۳), «An Evaluation of Applying Probabilities Arithmetic in ...
  • Shahrazuri, Sh. (۲۰۰۴), al-Shajarah al-Ilahiyyah (in Arabic). Tehran, Iranian Research ...
  • Sobhani, J. (۱۹۹۱), al-ilahiyat (in Arabic). Qom, al-Markaz al-Alami li-Derasat ...
  • Suhrawardi, Sh. (۱۹۹۶), Mosannafat Sheykh Ishraq (in Arabic). Tehran, Institute ...
  • Swinburne, R. (۲۰۱۰), Is There a God?. New York, Oxfor ...
  • Zamani Qomshaee, ʻA. (۱۹۹۵), «Argument of Order based on Probabilities», ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع