Provisions Comparison of The National Building Regulations (The Eighth Topic) and Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings (۲۸۰۰ Standard) for Masonry Buildings with Ring Beam

Publish Year: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 9

This Paper With 9 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JCER-6-2_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 مرداد 1403

Abstract:

Buildings with masonry materials are one of the weakest buildings against earthquakes, and the importance of proper design and correct construction of these buildings is not hidden. Among The buildings with masonry materials, the buildings with Ring beams are the most common of such buildings. Engineers use internal and external regulations and standards to design ring beam masonry buildings. The two main references for the design and construction of masonry buildings with Ring beams are the Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings (Standard ۲۸۰۰, Fourth Edition) and the Eighth Topic of the National Building Regulations (۲۰۲۰ Edition) under the title of design and construction of buildings with masonry materials. The Provisions for masonry buildings with Ring beams are given in the fifth chapter of the Eighth Topic of the National Building Regulations and the Seventh Chapter of the ۲۸۰۰ Standard. In this research, an attempt was been made to examine the Provisions of masonry buildings with Ring beams of these two references and to identify the discrepancies and differences in the provisions. The investigation of these two references has shown that there were more than ۶۶ cases of differences in Provisions regarding masonry buildings with Ring beams between the Eighth Topic of the National Building Regulations and the Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings. Most of the differences in the criteria were related to the sections of vertical and horizontal Ring beams, structural walls, and Non-structural walls with ۳۴ cases and ۵۱.۵% compared to the total difference. Also, the type of soil is classified in the Eighth Topic of The National Construction Regulations with ۳ types of soil and the ۲۸۰۰ Standard of Conduct is classified with ۴ types of soil.Buildings with masonry materials are one of the weakest buildings against earthquakes, and the importance of proper design and correct construction of these buildings is not hidden. Among The buildings with masonry materials, the buildings with Ring beams are the most common of such buildings. Engineers use internal and external regulations and standards to design ring beam masonry buildings. The two main references for the design and construction of masonry buildings with Ring beams are the Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings (Standard ۲۸۰۰, Fourth Edition) and the Eighth Topic of the National Building Regulations (۲۰۲۰ Edition) under the title of design and construction of buildings with masonry materials. The Provisions for masonry buildings with Ring beams are given in the fifth chapter of the Eighth Topic of the National Building Regulations and the Seventh Chapter of the ۲۸۰۰ Standard. In this research, an attempt was been made to examine the Provisions of masonry buildings with Ring beams of these two references and to identify the discrepancies and differences in the provisions. The investigation of these two references has shown that there were more than ۶۶ cases of differences in Provisions regarding masonry buildings with Ring beams between the Eighth Topic of the National Building Regulations and the Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings. Most of the differences in the criteria were related to the sections of vertical and horizontal Ring beams, structural walls, and Non-structural walls with ۳۴ cases and ۵۱.۵% compared to the total difference. Also, the type of soil is classified in the Eighth Topic of The National Construction Regulations with ۳ types of soil and the ۲۸۰۰ Standard of Conduct is classified with ۴ types of soil.

Authors

Hossein Nematian jelodar

Department of civil Engineering, Chalus Branch, Islamic Azad University, Chalus, Iran

Negar Moloukaneh

Department of civil Engineering, Chalus Branch, Islamic Azad University, Chalus, Iran

Ayda Khazaei poul

Department of civil Engineering, Chalus Branch, Islamic Azad University, Chalus, Iran