Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Lebanon Waterpipe Dependence Scale in a Sample of Iranian Waterpipe Smokers

Publish Year: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 39

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_AHJK-12-4_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 9 مرداد 1403

Abstract:

Background: Waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) has recently increased in Iran. There is no valid instrumentto measure the level of nicotine dependence among its consumers. This study was aimed to investigate thevalidity and reliability of the Lebanon Waterpipe Dependence Scale-۱۱ (LWDS-۱۱).Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the year ۲۰۱۷ whereby ۳۶۷ waterpipe smokers wererecruited from Golestan Province of Iran. LWDS-۱۱ scale is composed of ۴ subscales: ۱) nicotine dependence,۲) negative reinforcement, ۳) psychological craving, and ۴) positive reinforcement. The validity of thequestionnaire was examined using construct validity. Reliability of this scale was examined using test-retestreliability and internal consistency.Findings: The four-factor model for LWDS [comparative fit index (CFI) = ۰.۹۸۵, Tucker-Lewis index(TLI) = ۰.۹۷۹, standardised root mean residual (SRMR) = ۰.۰۵۹, root mean square error of approximation(RMSEA) = ۰.۰۴۹ (۰.۰۳۱, ۰.۰۶۱)] demonstrated good fit to this data. Cronbach’s α was ۰.۸۲۵ for totalscale and it was ۰.۸۱۸, ۰.۷۴۶, ۰.۶۲۴, and ۰.۶۷۰ for each individual subscale. The test-retest reliability of thescale was ۰.۹۲۵.Conclusion: All goodness of fit indices (GFIs) represented a good fit of model. The LWDS-۱۱ scale had anappropriate remarkable validity and reliability for waterpipe consumers to measure the level of nicotinedependence and it appeared to be likely useful for utilizing in the clinical and epidemiological studies.

Authors

Bagher Pahlavanzadeh

Department of Biostatistics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Seyed Abolhassan Naghibi

Department of Public Health, School of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

Rahman Berdi-Ozounidavaji

Health Management and Social Development Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

Fatemeh Zarghami

Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Shirin Shahbazi-Sighaldeh

Department of Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Ali Mohammadinia

Department of Public Health, School of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

Mahdieh Sadat Hosseini

Department of Public Health, School of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

Kamal Mirkarimi

Health Management and Social Development Research Center AND Department of Public Health, School of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

Amangholi Rahimi

Gonbad-e-Qabus Health Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

Mohammad Shoaib-Hamrah

Center for Rural Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia

Edwin Paul

Center for Rural Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia

Abdurrahman Charkazi

Environmental Health Research Center AND Department of Public Health, School of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran