Minimum Miscibility Pressure Calculation: A comparison Between Multi Contact Test and Compositional Simulation

Publish Year: 1390
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 699

This Paper With 21 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

IPEC03_160

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 7 تیر 1393

Abstract:

Multicontact miscible displacement occurs in systems when either the initial tie line or the injection tie line is a critical tie line. The oil recovery decreases sharply, with the system pressure, below the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP). Therefore the estimation of MMP is an important issue in reservoir fluid phase behavior modeling for the reservoirs with miscible gas injection. There are several approaches for MMP estimation.In this work, Multiple Contact Test (thermodynamic modeling) and Compositional Simulation (fluid flow modeling) are compared to experimental data for their capability to estimate MMP. Phase behavior and MMP calculation are performed on several oil samples from published data and the advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed. For most of the cases, predictions of the Multiple Contact Test results are in better agreement with the experimental PVT data. In addition there is no need for pseudo-component generation and detailed system information can be preserved for both reservoir fluid and injected gas.

Authors

S.M. Seyyedsar

Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box ۱۱۳۶۵-۹۴۶۵, Tehran, Iran

M. Assareh

Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box ۱۱۳۶۵-۹۴۶۵, Tehran, Iran

C. Ghotbi

Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box ۱۱۳۶۵-۹۴۶۵, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Aziz, K., and A Settari. Petroleum Reservoir Simulation. London: Applied ...
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2005. ...
  • Coats, K.H. "An Equation of State Co mpositional Model." SPEJ, ...
  • Coats, K.H., Thomas, L.K. and Pierson, R.G. "Co mpositional and ...
  • Collins, D.A., L.X. Nghiem, and Y.-K. Li. "An Efficient Approach ...
  • Cotterman, R.L., and J.M Prausnitz. "Flash Calculations for Continuous or ...
  • Co mpositional Simulation of Gas Injection Processes." SPE RES.ENG, 1992: ...
  • Green, Don W., and G. Paul Willhite Enhancesd oil recovery ...
  • Hoier, L. Miscibility Variations n Co mpositionally Grading Petroleum Reservoirs. ...
  • Johns, R.T., and F.M. Orr. Miscible Gas Displacemen ts of ...
  • Michelsen, M.L. "The Isothermal Flash Problem, Part I: Stability." Fluid ...
  • Prausnitz, J.M., et al. Molecular Th ermodyna mics of Fluid ...
  • Robinson, D.B, and D.Y Peng. "The Characteriza tion of Heptanes ...
  • University of Texas at Austin Center for Petroleum and Geosystems ...
  • Shah varanfard, A., B. Moradi, S. A. Tahami, and A. ...
  • Shtepani, E., F. B. Thomas, and D. B. Bennion. "New ...
  • Whitson, Curtis H., and Michael R. Brule. Phase Behavior. Richardson, ...
  • WinProp. User's Guide, Calgary, Alberta: Computer Modelling Group Ltd., 2002. ...
  • Young, L.C., and R.E. Stephenson. "A Gen eralized Co mpositional ...
  • Zick, A.A. A Combined Co n de n sing/Vap orizing ...
  • Table 1. AIolar Composition of Oil Samples (Jaubert, Avaullee and ...
  • 672 1.557 2. 3 37 3.29 3. 508 3.606 3. ...
  • .576 7.894 6. 7 3 1.485 3. s99 1.937 2. ...
  • Talle 2. NIolar Composition of Injected Gases - (Jaulbert, Avaullee ...
  • 190 76.650 12.020 5.260 0.740 1.490 0.330 0.410 0.260 0.120 ...
  • _ 3. Reservoi. Temperature Samples - (.J:uberct, Avaullee _ Souvay ...
  • 650 81.710 9.160 4.540 0.480 1.210 0.190 0.260 0.1 30 ...
  • 820 81.39 9.150 4.670 0.500 1.240 0.200 0.260 0.090 0.060 ...
  • 000 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.:00 ...
  • Avaullee and Souvay 2001) (bar) ...
  • 332812500 o. 396093750 _ 101953125 0. 139062500 _ 065234375 0. ...
  • O.02 1108179 _ o21635884 0.08126649 1 _ 205804749 ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع