The relation between problem of evil and onto-epistemology of philosophers

The problem of evil is only when proposed that philosophers are asking from evil’s relation whit God, as before this question it is not important the existence or non-existence of these or those evils; among philosophers who have been discoursed on the problem of evil , because of this , there are atheists philosophers who that know this problem as the greatest refuge for atheism ,on the one hand, and there are theist philosophers too ,on the another one, who whit demonstrating evil as non-existential argued against them.We are proved that, in this article, all philosophers – either theists or atheists - neglected from God’s definition in their discourses, although they have discoursed on the evil’s definition; when we are to be examine, in other word, the relation between two things – here evil’s relation with God – we, on the one hand, have to discourse on the evil’s definition and its existence or none-existence, and have to say, but moreover, God – that we examine evil’s relation with Him - who is He in our viewpoint, on the another one, too.We reveal that, in this article, all of philosophy problems particularly the problem of evil – that asking from evil’s relation with God - are examining under philosophers onto-epistemology and it is clear that philosophers different onto-epistemologies entails differences between their understanding from God. So, all philosophers - who discourse on the problem of evil and it’s relation with God – have to say what is their onto-epistemology on the former, in order to characterize that God who is He in their viewpoints, on the latter, to properly examine the problem of evil.

Keywords:

God , evil , beauty attributes , glory attributes