The Comparison of Animated English Grammar Teaching versus Still Picture Grammar Teaching and Their Effect on Grammatical Knowledge of Iranian EFL Intermediate Learners

Publish Year: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 546

This Paper With 20 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

LPMCONF01_1001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 7 اردیبهشت 1396

Abstract:

This study investigated the effect of animated and still pictures on English passive voice learning and compared these new technology assisted methods with traditional grammar teaching methods in Iran. At the outset of the experiment, a placement test was administered to ensure the homogeneity of the learners. Seventy five students who were at the intermediate level were selected and divided into three groups: animated pictures teaching group, still pictures teaching group and control group (real teacher explanation). Then, a pre-test on English passive voice was given to all groups. After eight sessions of treatment, a post-test and a satisfaction questionnaire were administrated. The results showed that the learners’ grammatical knowledge of English passive voice in three groups improved significantly after treatment. However, there was not a significant difference between these teaching modes. Moreover, the questionnaire showed that the students had a positive preference toward animated and still picture grammar teaching modes, however, the difference between the students’ preferences toward teaching modes was not significant. It must never be assumed that specific multimodal teaching will have the same use or will have the same effect on all students. Learner’s developmental level and level of need for cognition should be considered.

Authors

Farrokhlagha Heidari

Assistant Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

Hossein Nikraftar

M.A. Candidate, Department of English Language and Literature, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Cook, V. (2002). Second Language Learning and Teaching. Great Britain: ...
  • Celce Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a Second Or ...
  • Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations : A dual coding approach. ...
  • Intcrnationa Congress on Language and Literature October 06 2016 ...
  • Mayer, R. E. (2002). Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. In ...
  • Elster, C. A. (1992). Influences of Text and Pictures On ...
  • Hinkel, E. (2002). Tense, aspect and the passive voice in ...
  • Schnotz, W. (2002). Enabling, Facilitating and Inhibiting Effects in Learning ...
  • Caplan, E. A. (2002). The effects of Animated Textual Instruction ...
  • Roche, J., & Scheller, J. (2002). Grammar Animations and Cognition. ...
  • Kolesnikova, A. (2011). Investigating Effects of Computer-b ased Grammar Tutorials. ...
  • Mohammed, R. F. (2012). The Effectiveness of Using Subtitled Video ...
  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The Role of Consciousnes in Second Language ...
  • Williams, Z. (2012). The Use of Multimedia Material in Teaching ...
  • Aslani, M., & Tabrizi, H. H. (2012). Teaching Grammar to ...
  • Hoffler, N. T. & Luetner. D (2008). Instructional animation versus ...
  • Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an ...
  • Kim, S., Yoon, M., Whang, S. M., Twersky, B., & ...
  • Sweller, J. (2002). Implications of Cognitive Load Theory for Multimedi ...
  • Sweller, J. (1992). Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty and Instructional ...
  • Intcrnationa Congress on Language and Literature October 06 2016 ...
  • Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, ...
  • Anglin, G. J., Towers, R. L., & Levie, W. H. ...
  • Han, Z., Park, E., Combs, C. (2002). Textual Enhancement of ...
  • Burgess, J., & Etherington, S. (2002). Focus On Grammatical Form: ...
  • Rahmanimo ghadam, A., & Talafian, H. (2012). PowerPoint Presentation and ...
  • Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural Differences in Student and Teacher ...
  • Borg, S. (2001). Key concepts in ELT: Teachers" beliefs. ELT ...
  • Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2001). How languages are ...
  • Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: ...
  • Studies, 28, 228-212. DO) 10.1 001/ijhc.1018 [28] Beatty, L. F. ...
  • Roncarelli, R. (1929). The Computer Animation Dictionary. New York, NY: ...
  • Chomsky, N. (1920). Rules and Repre sentations _ Oxford: Blackwell. ...
  • Intcrnationa Congress on Language and Literature October 06 2016 ...
  • Intcrnationl Congress on Languagc and Literature October 06 2016 ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع