Comparison of contrast water immersion, active recovery and passive recovery on blood lactate and CRP levels in table tennis players
Publish place: Journal of Physical Activity and Hormones، Vol: 1، Issue: 2
Publish Year: 1396
Type: Journal paper
Language: English
View: 483
This Paper With 12 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- I'm the author of the paper
Export:
Document National Code:
JR_JPAH-1-2_002
Index date: 25 June 2019
Comparison of contrast water immersion, active recovery and passive recovery on blood lactate and CRP levels in table tennis players abstract
Introduction: The benefits of rapid recovery after intense exercise are widely recognized, and lactate elimination and inflammation reducing are the main indicators of recovery rate. The effects of water immersion on lactate elimination and C-reactive protein (CRP) not well known, thus the purpose of this study was to investigate the comparison of contrast water immersion, active recovery and passive recovery on blood lactate and CRP levels in table tennis players. Material & Methods: This semi-experimental study was assigned to 30 male table tennis athletes who were divided into three groups of 10 as follows: the passive recovery, active recovery and contrast water immersion (alternating hot (38ᴼC) and cold (12ᴼC)) groups. All of the subjects undertook the Bruce test protocol and blood lactate and CRP levels were measured before and immediately after the intense exercise and after 15 min of recovery. Results: Repeated measures ANOVA test showed that the blood lactate and CRP levels increased immediately after the intense exercise in all three groups (P<0.05). Blood lactate and CRP levels decreased after 15 min passive recovery, active recovery and contrast water immersion compare to after the intense exercise (P<0.05). Bonferroni Post hoc test indicates that blood lactate levels were lower after the contrast water immersion than the passive recovery and active recovery (P<0.05); however for CRP, no significant differences were observed between three types of recovery. Conclusions: It can be concluded that contrast water immersion is better than passive and active recovery for blood lactate elimination in table tennis players after intensive exercise; however all of these strategies are well for CRP reducing after intensive exercise.
Comparison of contrast water immersion, active recovery and passive recovery on blood lactate and CRP levels in table tennis players Keywords:
Comparison of contrast water immersion, active recovery and passive recovery on blood lactate and CRP levels in table tennis players authors
Miad Mokayef
Department of Exercise physiology, Marvdasht branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
Parisa Shahini
Department of Exercise physiology, Marvdasht branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :