Controversy Concerning Constitutional Cancer: Historical Review
Publish Year: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 287
This Paper With 6 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
این Paper در بخشهای موضوعی زیر دسته بندی شده است:
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_INTJMI-5-2_001
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 15 مهر 1398
Abstract:
Objective: The general pathology of cancer was long in turmoil over the two extremes of constitutionalism andlocalism. Therefore, my mini-Library of historical works was searched so as to obtain a good idea as to theultimate development.Methods: Many different literatures on the subject matter were reviewed and used.Results: Two major issues were delineated. The constitutional theory saw cancer being a whole body affair withsome local manifestations whereas the localists believed in a focal origin which may go on to manifest widely.Naturally, there was the midway group called the dualists who managed to hold both conceptsConclusion: The controversy that reigned in the history of these concepts are deemed to be worthy ofdocumentation. By 1900, the localists gained the upper hand principally on the principle of embolism.