Controversy Concerning Constitutional Cancer: Historical Review

Objective: The general pathology of cancer was long in turmoil over the two extremes of constitutionalism andlocalism. Therefore, my mini-Library of historical works was searched so as to obtain a good idea as to theultimate development.Methods: Many different literatures on the subject matter were reviewed and used.Results: Two major issues were delineated. The constitutional theory saw cancer being a whole body affair withsome local manifestations whereas the localists believed in a focal origin which may go on to manifest widely.Naturally, there was the midway group called the dualists who managed to hold both conceptsConclusion: The controversy that reigned in the history of these concepts are deemed to be worthy ofdocumentation. By 1900, the localists gained the upper hand principally on the principle of embolism.

Controversy Concerning Constitutional Cancer: Historical Review Keywords:

Cancer , Constitutionalists , Dualists , Localists , Embolism , History