سیویلیکا را در شبکه های اجتماعی دنبال نمایید.

Evaluation of Morphometric Differences among Indigenous Chicken Populations in Bale Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia

Publish Year: 1397
Type: Journal paper
Language: English
View: 369

This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

Export:

Link to this Paper:

Document National Code:

JR_PSJG-6-2_009

Index date: 9 October 2019

Evaluation of Morphometric Differences among Indigenous Chicken Populations in Bale Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia abstract

The study was conducted in five selected districts in Bale zone South East, Ethiopia to evaluate the morphometric difference among indigenous chicken populations. Simple random sampling method was used to select 400 households who owned indigenous chicken population. From these households, a total of 840 adult (more than 6 months of age) indigenous chickens (225 males and 615 females) were used for morphometric traits measurements. Linear measurements were taken to the nearest of 0.5 cm and body weight was recorded at a precision scale of 100 g. Multivariate variance analysis was used to determine major traits that differentiate chicken population. Canonical discriminant multivariate statistical analysis was conducted for more powerful traits comparisons. Stepwise discriminant analysis was conducted to check the discriminating power of the traits. Pairwise Mahalanobis analysis was carried out to see the distance between indigenous chicken in the study districts. The study revealed that there were significant variations in morphometric traits across the study districts except shank circumference and wing span in hens and shank length, comb height, comb length, beak length and wattle length in cocks. There were significant variations in linear body measurements between sexes. Pairwise Mahalanobis distances between indigenous chicken between most of study districts were significant. Generally, there were morphological traits variations observed among the indigenous chicken populations across the study districts and between sexes, which suggest that there is an opportunity for genetic improvement through selection. Thus, farmers should get technical supports how to select best indigenous chicken for breeding purpose and formulation of breeding plan should be implemented to conserve indigenous chicken genetic resources for genetic improvement strategies.

Evaluation of Morphometric Differences among Indigenous Chicken Populations in Bale Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia Keywords:

Evaluation of Morphometric Differences among Indigenous Chicken Populations in Bale Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia authors

Tareke M

Madda Walabu University, College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Bale Robe, Ethiopia

Assefa B

Madda Walabu University, College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Bale Robe, Ethiopia

Abate T

Madda Walabu University, College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Bale Robe, Ethiopia

Tekletsadik E

Madda Walabu University, College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Bale Robe, Ethiopia

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
Aklilu E, Kebede K, Dessie T and Banerjee AK. 2013. ...
Aklilu E. 2013. On-farmphenotypic characterization of indigenous chicken and chicken ...
Aklilu HA. 2007. Village poultry in Ethiopia; socio-technical analysis and ...
Al-Atiyat R. 2009. Diversity of chicken populations in Jordan determined ...
Arsham H. 2005. Questionnaire design and survey sampling. http://home.ubalt.edu /ntsbarsh/stat-data/surveys.htm ...
Assan N. 2013. Bio-prediction of body weight and carcass parameters ...
CSA (Central Statistics Agency). 2015. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. ...
Dessie T. 2003. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of local chicken ...
FAO. 2011. Draft guidelines on phenotypic characterization of animal genetic ...
Getu A, Alemayehu K & Wuletaw Z. 2013.Phenotypic characterization of ...
Gheisari AA, Maghsoudinejad G & Azarbayejani A. 2016. Evaluation of ...
Hailu A. 2012, Phenotypic Characterization of indigenous Chicken Ecotypes in ...
Hussen H. 2007. Phonotypic and genetic characterization of indigenous chicken ...
Kibret B. 2008. In situ characterization of local chicken eco-type ...
Mekonnen G. 2007. Characterization of smallholder poultry production and marketing ...
Mekuanint S, Alemneh T & Asredie T. 2017. Indigestible rumen ...
Moges F, Mellesse A & Dessie T. 2010. Assessment of ...
Moreda E, Hareppal S, Johansson A, SisayeT & Sahile Z. ...
Negassa D, Melesse A & Banerjee S. 2014. Phenotypic characterization ...
Nigussie D., Van der Waaij LH, Dessie T & Van ...
Ogah DM, Alaga AA & Momoh OM.  2011. Principal component ...
Olawunmi O, Salako, AE &Afuwape AA. 2008. Morphometic differentiation and ...
Rosario MF, Silva MAN, Coelho AAD & Savino VJM. 2008. ...
SAS (Statistical Analysis System). 2002. SAS® 9.1, users guide. SAS ...
SAS (Statistical Analysis System). 2008. SAS/STAT® 9.2,user’s guide, the STEPDISC ...
Tadelle D, Kijora C & Peters KJ. 2003. Indigenous chicken ...
Yami A & Dessie T. 1997.The status of poultry research ...
نمایش کامل مراجع