Do management measurement models always give us the right results Examine the example : FMEA, KANO and grading by Mini-Max Normalization Table
Publish place: International Conference on Quantitative Models and Techniques in Management (QMTM2020)
Publish Year: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 475
This Paper With 13 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
QMTM02_059
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 22 مرداد 1399
Abstract:
Measurement models have many applications in various areas of management. These can be include measuring risk priorities with the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) model, measuring customer satisfaction or prioritizing product design requirements with the KANO model, and even the Mini-Max normalization model of tabledata for a prioritization purpose. In this article, we show why and how the results of these measurements can lead to erroneous and misleading results. With this, we do not want to discredit such a widespread and well-established procedure as FMEA but just highlight that those are include questionable aggregations. The main cause of thesemisleading results is the use of unauthorized statistics in scales of measurement
Keywords:
Authors
Behzad Rabiei
M.Sc. in industrial engineering, Imam Hossein Comprehensive University
Shahram Aliyari
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Imam Hossein Comprehensive University
Reza Rabiei
M.Sc. in Executive Management, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Center Branch
Fatemeh Niknejad
M.Sc. Student of BioStatistics, Dept. of BioStatistics School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.