MODIFICATION FACTORS FOR RESIDUAL DRIFT ASSESSMENT OF ADJACENT SMRFS CONSIDERING STRUCTURAL POUNDING

Publish Year: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 162

متن کامل این Paper منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل Paper (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

SEE08_505

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 23 آبان 1399

Abstract:

Maximum Residual Interstory Drift Ratio (MRIDR) is permanent lateral deformations at the end of the severe earthquake, even though the structure did not experience severe damage or total collapse. It was noted that Reinforced Concrete (RC) structures having members with stiffness-and-strength degrading features experience smaller Residual Drift (RD) than those steel structure having members with non-degrading features. Due to record-to-record variability of RD, the estimation of this parameter is important during the performance-based assessment of existing structure. Therefore, some researchers proposed approximate methods to estimate RD (Ruiz-García and Chora, 2015). Yahyazadeh and Yakhchalian (2018) evaluated the effects of using fluid viscous dampers on the MRIDR response of steel structures and concluded that linear dampers have better performance than nonlinear one. Approximate estimation of RD is important especially for adjacent structures because pounding phenomenon can significantly influence the amount of RD. Recently, Kazemi et al. (2019) investigated the effects of pounding phenomenon on the seismic collapse capacity of the 2, 4-, 6- and 8-Story adjacent structures, and proposed modification factors to estimate seismic collapse capacity of a structure considering pounding. In this study, the 4- and 8-Story RC SMRFs designed by Haselton and Deierlein (2007) were considered ( design ID of 4- and 8-Story structures are 1003 and 1011, respectively). The site of interest was considered in Northern Los Angeles, which is a high seismic regions of California, with soil class D and seismic design parameters of SDS=1.5g and SD1=0.9g. Moreover, adjacent structures of the 3- and 6-Story steel SMRFs designed by Kitayama and Constantinou (2016) were considered. Steel SMRFs were assumed to be located in California at latitude 37.8814°N and longitude 122.08°W, with soil class D and seismic design parameters of SDS=1.25g and SD1=0.6g. To consider the P-Delta effect, which this effect plays a key role in sideway collapse, all columns except those in the SMRFs are assumed as gravity columns and were modeled as leaning column. In addition, nonlinear behavior of the structures' elements were modeled as a nonlinear rotational spring at both ends of each element using the Modified Ibarra–Krawinkler bilinear-hysteretic model (Kazemi et al., 2018a and 2019). Therefore, an element in the SMRFs was modeled with an elastic beam-column element in the middle and two zero-length elements located at both ends. The linear viscoelastic contact model (Kelvin-Voigt model) was developed in OpenSees software to model pounding phenomenon. For all pounding SMRFs, the impact dampingcoefficient, Cimp, and the impact stiffness, K imp, were obtained from studies presented by Kazemi et al. (2018b) and Mohebi et al. (2018). Different condition of adjacency of RC and steel SMRFs assuming three separation distance of 0.0, 0.5d and 1.0d, where d is the minimum separation distance prescribed by the provisions, were considered. Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) were performed to assess the values of MRIDR capacity, RD Sa , which is displayed by the flat part of each IDA curves. The values of median MRIDR capacity, median RD Sa , corresponding to different MRIDR levels of 0.2%, 0.5%, 1.0% and 2.0% are determined by performing IDAs assuming 28 near-field records having pulse subset and 28 near-field records having no-pulse subset presented in FEMA P695.

Authors

Farzin KAZEMI

M.Sc. in Earthquake Engineering, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

Benyamin MOHEBI

Assistant Professor, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran