Quine on Charity and Rationality
Publish place: Philosophical Investigations، Vol: 14، Issue: 32
Publish Year: 1399
Type: Journal paper
Language: English
View: 212
This Paper With 14 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- I'm the author of the paper
Export:
Document National Code:
JR_PHILO-14-32_011
Index date: 11 August 2021
Quine on Charity and Rationality abstract
W. V. Quine borrows the principle of charity from Neil Wilson, but modifies and enriches its content to fit into his naturalistic philosophy and epistemology. While Wilson ties this principle to the notion of truth, Quine’s attempts in finding a ground for it lead him to the concept of common rationality shared by all human beings, which is ultimately what makes communication, as the basis of our social life, possible. According to the paper's argument, three other expressions, that is, the principles of psychological plausibility, empathy, and projection, which Quine uses in the contexts akin to that of the principle of charity, are not but different terms for one basic idea. Given the ties between the principle of charity and rationality, Quine's wide use of the principle and its affiliated notions proves that rationality is a central, often neglected, idea in his philosophy. The paper begins with an introductory account of the brief explanation Wilson gives of the principle of charity. Then it spells out four concepts or principles of charity, psychological plausibility, empathy, and projection showing how these four notions or principles basically express the same thing. Examining the relation of these last three principles with the principle of charity and rationality, the paper's main objective is to highlight the centrality of common rationality in Quine's philosophy, despite the common view that Quine is purely engaged with semantical aspects of Language.
Quine on Charity and Rationality Keywords:
rationality , the principles of charity , psychological plausibility , empathy , and projection , truth
Quine on Charity and Rationality authors
حمیدرضا محبوبی آرانی
استادیار گروه فلسفه دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
مجتبی درایتی
دکتری فلسفه، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :