Providing a Model for Explaining the Impact of Achievement Goals, Social Comparison, Cognitive-Emotional Trust, and mismatch between effort and reward on student cheating behavior

Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 176

This Paper With 14 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_INJPM-9-8_013

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 10 شهریور 1400

Abstract:

Background cheating is one of the forms of abuse that has become one of the biggest concerns of educational institutions. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to Provide a model for explaining the impact of achievement goals, social comparison, cognitive-emotional trust, and imbalance between effort -reward on student cheating behavior. Methods: Structural equation modeling was the method used in this research. The statistical population of this study consisted of ۳۸۴ students selected from male second- high schools in ۴ districts of Tehran in the academic year ۲۰۱۷-۲۰۱۸. According to Morgan table, the sample size was specified; and cluster random sampling method was used for sample selection. Achievement Goals Questionnaire, developed by Migli et al., ۲۰۰۰; Social Comparison Scale by Chan and Parandrgst, ۲۰۰۷; Cognitive -Emotional Trust Scale by Yang and Mohsedler, ۲۰۱۰; Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire by Sigrist, ۲۰۱۰; and cheating Behavior Questionnaire by Newstead et al., ۱۹۹۶ were applied for collecting data. For data analysis, Pearson’s correlation with SPSS ۲۰ and Amos ۲۴ (α = ۰.۰۵) were used. Results: A significant positive correlation was found between avoidance (r=.۵۶۰, P <۰.۰۱), performance (r = .۳۲۹, P <۰.۰۱) and cheating behavior.Whearas, there was a significant negative correlation between avoidance subscale and cheating behavior (r =-۴۲۹, p <۰.۰۱). Mreover, there was no significant relationship between imbalance effort-reward and cheating behavior. However, emotional trust (r=.۳۹۱, P <۰.۰۱) and cognitive trust (r=.۱۴۵, P <۰.۰۱) were positively correlated with cheating behavior. Conclusion: The results obtained in this study indicated that social comparison and cognitive-emotional trust variables have the power to explain the scores of cheating behavior.  However, the other two variables of this study and model did not show a significant relationship with it..

Keywords:

Authors

Marjan Ghorbani Fard

Ph.D Candidate, Educational Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Mojgan Sepahmansour

Faculty member, Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Afsaneh Ghanbaripanah

Faculty Member, Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • REFERENCESAnderman EM, Koenka AC. The relation between academic motivation and ...
  • Ma Y, McCabe DL, Liu R. Students’ academic cheating in ...
  • Wong S, Yang L, Riecke B, Cramer E, Neustaedter C. ...
  • Ames C. Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of ...
  • Martin AJ, Elliot AJ. The role of personal best (PB) ...
  • Anderman EM, Won S. Academic cheating in disliked classes. Ethics ...
  • Barzegar BK. The relationship between individual and situational factors with ...
  • Islam T, Sheikh Z, Hameed Z, Khan IU, Azam RI. ...
  • Gentina E, Shrum LJ, Lowrey TM, Vitell SJ, Rose GM. ...
  • Bretag T, Harper R, Rundle K, Newton PM, Ellis C, ...
  • Fosgaard TR. Students cheat more: Comparing the dishonesty of a ...
  • Brodowsky GH, Tarr E, Ho FN, Sciglimpaglia D. Tolerance for ...
  • Lewicki RJ, Tomlinson EC, Gillespie N. Models of interpersonal trust ...
  • McAllister DJ. Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation ...
  • Hsu MH, Ju TL, Yen CH, Chang CM. Knowledge sharing ...
  • Amigud A, Lancaster T. I will pay someone to do ...
  • Alimorad Z. Examining the Effect of Gender and Educational Level ...
  • Van Vegchel N, De Jonge J, Bosma H, Schaufeli W. ...
  • Ballantine JA, Guo X, Larres P. Can future managers and ...
  • Alt D. Assessing the connection between self-efficacy for learning and ...
  • Koul R. Cheating behavior among high school and college students: ...
  • McCabe DL, Butterfield KD, Trevino LK. Academic dishonesty in graduate ...
  • Midgley C, Kaplan A, Middleton M. Performance-approach goals: Good for ...
  • Yang J, Mossholder KW. Examining the effects of trust in ...
  • Siegrist J, Li J, Montano D. Psychometric properties of the ...
  • Newstead SE, Franklyn-Stokes A, Armstead P. Individual differences in student ...
  • Weisani M, Lavasani MG, Ejei J. The effect of achievement ...
  • Sepah Mansour M, Barati Z, Hoseingholi F. The mediating role ...
  • Mohammadzadeh, Rahman Seresht H, Kooshazadeh SA. The effect of cognitive ...
  • Yadegarfar Q, Ali Nia T, Hassan Nejad R, Fayyaz M, ...
  • Rettinger DA. The role of emotions and attitudes in causing ...
  • Park EJ, Park S, Jang IS. Academic cheating among nursing ...
  • Anderman EM, Griesinger T, Westerfield G. Motivation and cheating during ...
  • Brophy J. Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational psychologist. ۱۹۸۳ Sep ۱;۱۸(۳):۲۰۰-۱۵ ...
  • Anderman EM, Midgley C. Changes in self-reported academic cheating across ...
  • Shelton J, Hill JP. Effects on cheating of achievement anxiety ...
  • Ahanchian MR, Hosseini M, Hashemi FS, Tatari Y. Phenomenology of ...
  • Panatik SA, Rajab A, Shaari R, Saat MM, Wahab SA, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع