Exploring the Recycling of Objective Move Across RA Sections in Soft Science Disciplines
Publish place: Issues in Language Teaching، Vol: 10، Issue: 1
Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 173
This Paper With 30 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_ILT-10-1_006
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 بهمن 1400
Abstract:
Although a plethora of research endeavors have investigated the rhetorical structure of the Research Articles (RAs) through the lens of move analysis, Move Recycling (MR) across RA sections has remained unnoticed. The current study sought to bridge this gap by exploring cross-disciplinary variations in the recycling of the Objective move (research questions/hypotheses/purposes) across four conventional sections (Introduction, Method, Result, and Discussion) of RAs. To this end, ۶۰۰ English RAs from four prestigious journals in six soft science disciplines, published between ۲۰۰۶ and ۲۰۱۸, were selected. The quantitative data analysis results revealed that the Objective move’s recycling was sensitive to the disciplinary variations and RA sections. That is, Economics RAs were the main platforms for recycling the Objective move, and Psychology RAs witnessed the least amount of its recycling. Moreover, Objective move recycling was observed most frequently in the Discussion sections and least frequently in the Method sections of RAs. In the study’s qualitative phase, the RA authors’ rationales for MR, which were received via email, underwent content analysis. Based on the recurrent themes in the RA authors’ responses, four main reasons for MR, including editorial policy, readers’ guidance, discipline conventions, and RA length, were identified. This study’s findings might provide a concise view of MR for researchers, teachers, and students in various disciplines. EAP instructors can raise students’ awareness of MR and encourage them to use it in their RAs as a comprehension facilitator.
Keywords:
Authors
کیمیا سلطانی
Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
داود کوهی
Department of English, Islamic Azad University, Maragheh Branch, Iran.
نسرین حدیدی
Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :