Human Rights violations following the escalation of security-oriented criminal policy under the pretext of preventing the Covid-۱۹ pandemic

Criminal policy, as a strategic knowledge of using the achievements of criminal sciences to control crime and social unrest, is of great importance in managing the risks of changing crime commitment models following a change in lifestyle after the Covid-۱۹ pandemic. This universal disease can be explained and evaluated in relation to distortion as one of the aspects studied by criminologists. Some claim to be infected with the virus, harass others, or engage in challenges such as licking objects under the pretext of joking and having fun. However, the increase in these cases has caused the police and judicial authorities of some countries to issue warnings about judicial action in this regard, and not only the perpetrators of these jokes and patients who hide their illness, but also other people by implementing control measures that deprive people of their social rights. Securityism has violated the human rights in many countries, even the liberal western countries, under the pretext of protecting the health and lives of the people. Security-oriented legal policymaking has violated human rights by restricting public rights and freedoms under the pretext of a state of public health emergency, and by prioritizing security and government authority over citizens' rights in the wake of Covid-۱۹. Increasing social fear, growing fear of victimization and other types of social harm, growing domestic violence and theft from commercial premises, and increasing international trafficking in human beings and prohibited goods due to reduced presence and activity of law enforcement and surveillance systems; Security and justice in most countries, rising psychological consequences of quarantine tolerance, unemployment and worries about the future, and dozens of other phenomena and consequences in the recent pandemic - and, albeit at a slower pace, before the Kuwaiti pandemic- all led to many Governments and political regimes have intensified medical authoritarianism. In a descriptive-analytical and comparative way between the laws of some countries, the article analyzes the negative factors, effects and consequences of the crisis of mutual abuse of medical authoritarianism and legal securityism.

Keywords:

Covid-۱۹ , crisis criminology , human rights , legal policymaking , struggle for freedom and security