Psychological- Epistemological Barriers to Living Morally from the Point of View of Imam Ali (A.S.)
Publish place: Ethical Reflections، Vol: 2، Issue: 4
Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 165
This Paper With 20 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JER-2-4_004
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 9 مهر 1401
Abstract:
One of the important questions about morality is why human beings can’t live morally on the basis of moral will alone. In other words, why is it difficult to live morally? This is where the barriers to morality come into play. Any Human being who wants to live morally will face obstacles that prevent him from following the moral path of living. The obstacles of living morally can be divided into two sociological and psychological types. The sociological obstacles are some external factors that influence a person’s moral decisions and prevent him from living morally, such as public opinions, the value-judgments of others, the approvals and disapprovals, and likes and dislikes of others. The psychological barriers, themselves, are divided into two epistemological and non-epistemological types. The epistemological-psychological obstacles are obstacles that prevent moral living in the human psyche and are, of course, related to epistemology. According to Imam Ali (A.S.), pride, dogmatism, fanaticism and bigotry are among the epistemological- psychological obstacles. The present study makes an attempt to prove this claim in a descriptive-analytical way and to show how, according to Imam Ali (A.S.), these epistemological-psychological obstacles prevent moral living.
Keywords:
Moral living , barriers to living morally , epistemological-psychological obstacles , Imam Ali (a.s.)
Authors
علی اکبر عبدل آبادی
Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
علی بیات
Associate Professor, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Faculty of Islamic History and Civilization, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
طاهره محمدیان عمرانی
Ph.D in Comparative Religious Studies, Faculty of Religions, Comparative Religious Studies. University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran.
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :