L۲ Writers’ Processing of Teacher vs. Computer-generated Feedback

Publish Year: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 173

This Paper With 41 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ELT-12-26_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 10 دی 1401

Abstract:

Writing is thought as the most complicated skill in second language acquisition; therefore, L۲ researchers have always been in pursuit of discovering an effective approach to improve it. One of the most debated ways is feedback which has a key role in improving the quality of writing. Much of the previous research on feedback has focused on analyzing different types of feedback and their effect on the learners’ writings and few studies have examined the effectiveness of computer feedback. Therefore, the present study was conducted to ۱) determine what aspects of students’ writings receive computer feedback, ۲) examine the difference in the effect of computer-generatedfeedback (CBF) and Teacher-based feedback (TBF) on improving the students’ writing quality and ۳) compare the differences in Depth of Processing (DOP) in processing computer and teacher feedback. The results indicated that content, style and organization of their essays received feedback from the teacher and the computer. Teacher feedback was more effective in terms of its impact on improving the quality of the writing of the students than computer-generatedfeedback and it resulted in deeper processing of lexical items, whereas computer-generated feedback invoked medium processing on grammar.   

Authors

شیوا کیوان پناه

University of Tehran

سید محمد علوی

University of Tehran

رز مس چی

گروه زبان انگلیسی - دانشگاه تهران پردیس بین المللی کیش - کیش - ایران

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • A Comparative Study of Writing Assessment Using Activity Theory-Based Assessment Model (ATBAM) and a Traditional Approach [مقاله ژورنالی]
  • Ashwell, T. (۲۰۰۰). Patterns of teacher response to student writing ...
  • Attali, Y. (۲۰۰۴). Exploring the feedback and revision features of ...
  • Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (۲۰۰۶). Automated essay scoring with ...
  • Beach, R. (۱۹۷۶). Self-evaluation strategies of extensive and non-revisers. College ...
  • Bitchener, J. (۲۰۰۸). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. ...
  • Bitchener, J. (۲۰۱۲). A reflection on “the language learning potential” ...
  • Bitchener, John & Storch, Neomy. (۲۰۱۶). Written Corrective Feedback for ...
  • Bitchener, J. and Young, S. & Cameron, D. (۲۰۰۵). The ...
  • Carroll, S. and Swain, M. (۱۹۹۳). Explicit and implicit negative ...
  • Chandler, J. (۲۰۰۳). The Efficacy of Various Kinds of Error ...
  • Chen, C-F., & Cheng, W-Y. (۲۰۰۸). Beyond the design of ...
  • Coniam, D. (۲۰۰۹). Experimenting with a computer essay-scoring program based ...
  • Ebyary, Kh., Windeatt, S,. (۲۰۱۰). The Impact of Computer-Based Feedback ...
  • Ellis, R. (۲۰۰۸). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ...
  • Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (۲۰۰۱). Learner uptake ...
  • Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (۲۰۰۶). Implicit and ...
  • Enginarlar, H. (۱۹۹۳). Student response to teacher feedback in EFL ...
  • Ericsson, P. F., & Haswell, R. (Eds.). (۲۰۰۶). Machine scoring ...
  • Fathman, A., & Whalley, E. (۱۹۹۰). Teacher response to student ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (۱۹۹۵). Student reactions to teacher response in ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (۱۹۹۹). The case for grammar correction in ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (۲۰۰۲). Treatment of error in second language ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (۲۰۰۳). Response to student writing: Implications for ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (۲۰۰۴). The “Grammar Correction” Debate in L۲ ...
  • Ferris, D. (۲۰۰۶). ‘Does error feedback help student writers? New ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (۲۰۱۰). Second language writing research and written ...
  • Ferris, D. R. and Roberts. B. (۲۰۰۱). ‘Error feedback in ...
  • Frantzen, D. (۱۹۹۵). The effects of grammar supplementation on written ...
  • Guénette, D. (۲۰۰۷). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues ...
  • Grimes, D., and Warschauer, M. (۲۰۱۰). Utility in a Fallible ...
  • Han, Z-H. (۲۰۰۲). A study of the impact of recasts ...
  • Hedgcock, J. and Lefkowitz, N. (۱۹۹۶). Some input: Two analyses ...
  • Hutchison, D. (۲۰۰۷). An evaluation of computerised essay marking for ...
  • Hyland, F. (۲۰۱۰). Future directions in feedback on second language ...
  • Hyland, K. and Hyland. F. (۲۰۰۶). Feedback on second language ...
  • Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, ...
  • James, C. (۱۹۹۸). Errors in language learning and use. Essex, ...
  • Kahraman, A. (۲۰۱۳). Affective and cognitive effects of coded teacher ...
  • Kim, H. R., Bowles, M. (۲۰۱۹). How deeply do second ...
  • Krashen, S. D. (۱۹۸۴). Writing: Research, theory, and application. Oxford: ...
  • Lai, Y.-h. (۲۰۱۰). Which do students prefer to evaluate their ...
  • Lalande, J. F. (۱۹۸۲). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern ...
  • Lee, I. (۲۰۰۴). Error correction in L۲ secondary writing classrooms. ...
  • Lee, Y-W., Gentile, C., & Kantor, R. (۲۰۱۰). Toward automated ...
  • Lee, C., Wong, K., Cheung, W., & Lee, F. (۲۰۰۹). ...
  • Leung, B. W. (۲۰۱۷) The Study of Teacher Written Feedback: ...
  • Leow, R. P. (۲۰۱۵). Explicit learning in the L۲ classroom. ...
  • Leow, R. P., Hsieh, H. C., & Moreno, N. (۲۰۰۸). ...
  • Leow, R. P. & Mercer, J. D. (۲۰۱۵) Depth of ...
  • Loewen, S. (۲۰۰۴). Uptake in incidental focus on form in ...
  • Long, M. H. (۱۹۹۱). Focus on form: A design feature ...
  • Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (۲۰۰۰). How do ...
  • Miao, Y., Badger,R. and Zhen Y. (۲۰۰۶). A comparative study ...
  • Morgan-Short, K., Heil, J., Botero-Moriarty, A., & Ebert, S. (۲۰۱۲). ...
  • Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (۲۰۰۰). Effectiveness of L۲ ...
  • Poulisse, N. (۱۹۹۹). Slips of the tongue: Speech errors in ...
  • Qi, D. S., and Lapkin, S. (۲۰۰۱). Exploring the role ...
  • Sachs, R., & Polio, C. (۲۰۰۷). Learners’ uses of two ...
  • Semke, H. (۱۹۸۴). The effects of the red pen. Foreign ...
  • Sheen, Y. (۲۰۰۷). The effect of focused written corrective feedback ...
  • Shermis, M. D., & Burstein, J. (۲۰۰۳). ‘‘Introduction.’’ Automated essay ...
  • Shizuka, T. (۲۰۰۰). Effects of different editing methods on EFL ...
  • Sommers, N. (۱۹۸۰). Revision strategies of student writers and inexperienced ...
  • Truscott, J. (۱۹۹۶). The case against grammar correction in L۲ ...
  • Truscott, J. (۱۹۹۹). The case for “the case against grammar ...
  • Tuzi, F. (۲۰۰۴). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions ...
  • Ware, P. (۲۰۰۵). Automated writing evaluation as a pedagogical tool ...
  • Ware, P. (۲۰۱۱). Computer-Generated Feedback on Student Writing. TESOL Quarterly. ...
  • Warschauer, M. (۲۰۰۴). Technology and writing. In J. Cummins and ...
  • Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (۲۰۰۸). Automated writing assessment in ...
  • Warschauer, M., and Ware, P. (۲۰۰۶). Automated writing evaluation: defining ...
  • Yoshida, R. (۲۰۱۰). How Do Teachers and Learners Perceive Corrective ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع