Comparative study of ultrasonographic accuracy at ۸-۱۶ weeks of gestational age with the Naegele’s Revised Rule for delivery history

Publish Year: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 97

This Paper With 5 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JOGCR-8-2_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 9 اردیبهشت 1402

Abstract:

Introduction: Determining the correct date of pregnancy and fetal age has a very important role in the management of pregnancy from the first trimester to delivery, which makes it  necessary to know the exact method in this field. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the accuracy of ultrasound at ۸-۱۶ weeks with Naegele’s Revised Rule of the delivery date.Methods: This study was performed on ۵۰ pregnant women. After recording demographic information and age of delivery, sonography of weeks ۸-۱۶ and Naegel’s Revised Rule were also recorded. A Paired t-test was used to compare data.Results: The results of our study showed that the average difference between the Naegele’s Revised Rule and real age was ۳.۵۲ days, which is a significant difference. However, the average difference between the estimated date by ultrasound and real age is ۰.۵۸ days, which is not a significant difference. Ultrasound is more accurate than the Naegele’s Revised Rule, which still did not differ significantly from the actual date of delivery by grouping by age, sex of the fetus, number of pregnancies, and deliveries.Conclusion: Ultrasound has more accuracy in accurately estimating the date of delivery, and therefore using this method and relying on it has more reliability than the Naegele’s Revised  Rule.

Authors

Shahla Mirgaloybayat

Endometriosis Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Sharareh Saneei

Associate professor of Radiology, School of medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Science, Zahedan, Iran

Marziyeh Ajdary

Endometriosis Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Saeedeh Sarhadi

Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine Zahedan University of Medical Science

Neda Eslahi

Endometriosis Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Foroogh Sadat Mousavi

General Physician, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

farahnaz farzaneh

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Infectious disease and Tropical medicine research center of Zahedan university of medical sciences, Endometriosis Research Center , Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • De Mola CL, De França GVA, de Avila Quevedo L, ...
  • Butt K, Lim K, Bly S, Cargill Y, Davies G, ...
  • Dammer U, Raabe E, Kehl S, Schmid M, Mayr A, ...
  • Dehghani Firouzabadi R, Botorabi T, Tayebi N. The Accuracy Determination ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع