The Responsiveness of Three Persian Outcome Measures Following Physiotherapy Intervention in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain

Publish Year: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 97

This Paper With 9 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TABO-11-5_009

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 27 خرداد 1402

Abstract:

Objectives: A prospective cohort study to evaluate and compare the responsiveness of the Persian version of the neck disability index (NDI), neck pain & disability scale (NPDS), neck outcome score (NOOS), and to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimal detectable change (MDC). To date, no studies have made a direct comparison between the responsiveness of the Persian version of NPDS, NDI, and NOOS questionnaires.Methods: At the end of the study, ۵۵ patients with chronic non-specific neck pain completed the NPDS, NDI, and NOOS questionnaires at the beginning and end of three weeks of physiotherapy treatment. Additionally, patients completed the global rating of change scale to differentiate between improved and unimproved patients. Comparison of responsiveness was performed using anchor-based methods (receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and correlation analysis). MCID and MDC were assessed to investigate relevant changes for each questionnaire.Results: ROC curves analysis showed areas under the curves of ۰.۷۰, ۰.۶۴, and ۰.۴۳ to ۰.۶۳ for the NPDS, NDI, and NOOS subscales, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the global rating of the change scale and the change scores of the NPDS and NDI were ۰.۳۸ (P<۰.۰۱) and ۰.۳۰ (P<۰.۰۵), respectively. There were no significant correlations between NOOS subscales and global rating of change score (r=۰.۰۰۱- ۰.۲۱, P>۰.۰۵). The MCID for the NPDS, NDI, and NOOS subscales were ۲۸.۰۹ (score ۰-۱۰۰), ۷.۵ (score ۰-۵۰), and ۱۳.۷۵ to ۲۸.۶۴ (score ۰-۱۰۰), respectively. The MDCs were found to be in the following order: ۴۷.۱ points for NPDS, ۳۶.۱ for NDI, and ۲۳.۵ to ۳۹.۷ for NOOS subscales.Conclusion: The Persian NPDS seems more responsive than the NDI and NOOS questionnaires. The level of clinically meaningful change in NDI, NPDS, and NOOS questionnaires is in the range of measurement error.  Level of evidence: IV

Keywords:

Disability , Minimal clinically important difference , Neck disability questionnaires , neck pain , ROC curve

Authors

Seyed Ramin Dabiri

Orthopedic Department, Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Mohammad Reza Tehrani

Department of Physical Therapy, School of Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Farzad Omidi-Kashani

Orthopedic Department, Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Hamed Mami-Pour

Department of Physical Therapy, School of Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Hamed Tabesh

Department of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Ali Moradi PhD

Orthopedic Research Centre, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Salman Nazary-Moghadam

Department of Physical Therapy, School of Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran- Orthopedic Research Centre, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Huisstede BM, Wijnhoven HA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Koes BW, Verhaar JA, Picavet ...
  • Ferrari R, Russell AS. Regional musculoskeletal conditions: neck pain. Best Pract ...
  • Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Montazeri A, et al. Translation and validation ...
  • Deyo R. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back ...
  • Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, et al. Outcome measures ...
  • Shafiee E, Farzad M, Karbalaei M. A Systematic Review of ...
  • Pengel LH, Refshauge KM, Maher CG. Responsiveness of pain, disability, and ...
  • doi: ۱۰.۱۰۹۷/۰۰۰۰۷۶۳۲-۲۰۰۴۰۴۱۵۰-۰۰۰۱۱ ...
  • Jorritsma W, Dijkstra PU, de Vries GE, Geertzen JH, Reneman MF. ...
  • Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing ...
  • Lehman LA, Velozo CA. Ability to detect change in patient function: ...
  • Schellingerhout JM, Heymans MW, Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, Koes BW, ...
  • Nordin M, Carragee EJ, Hogg-Johnson S, et al. Assessment of neck ...
  • Rubinstein SM, van Tulder M. A best-evidence review of diagnostic procedures ...
  • Alexopoulos EC, Stathi I-C, Charizani F. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in ...
  • Mazaheri Tehrani MR, Nazary-Moghadam S, Dabiri SR. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, ...
  • de Vet HC, Ostelo RW, Terwee CB, et al. Minimally ...
  • Guzy G, Vernon H, Polczyk R, Szpitalak M. Psychometric validation of ...
  • Pereira M, Cruz EB, Domingues L, Duarte S, Carnide F, Fernandes ...
  • Monticone M, Ambrosini E, Vernon H, et al. Responsiveness and minimal ...
  • Salehi R, Negahban H, Saghayezhian N, Saadat M. The Responsiveness of ...
  • Ngo T, Stupar M, Côté P, Boyle E, Shearer H. ...
  • Schreiber S, Parent EC, Hill DL, Hedden DM, Moreau MJ, Southon ...
  • Nordqvist SF, Boesen VB, Rasmussen Å K, et al. Determining minimal ...
  • Maughan EF, Lewis JS. Outcome measures in chronic low back pain. ...
  • Freitas P, Pires D, Nunes C, Cruz EB. Cross-cultural adaptation and ...
  • Ferreira ML, Ferreira PH, Latimer J, et al. Comparison of general ...
  • Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Green A, Porucznik CA, Powell AP. Minimal ...
  • Sorensen AA, Howard D, Tan WH, Ketchersid J, Calfee RP. Minimal ...
  • Costa LO, Maher CG, Latimer J, et al. Clinimetric testing ...
  • de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol ...
  • Terwee CB, Schellingerhout JM, Verhagen AP, Koes BW, de Vet HC. ...
  • Holtermann A, Hansen JV, Burr H, Søgaard K. Prognostic factors for ...
  • Harrison JJ, Yorgey MK, Csiernik AJ, Vogler JH, Games KE. Clinician-friendly ...
  • Yeung TS, Wessel J, Stratford P, MacDermid J. Reliability, validity, and ...
  • Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability ...
  • Zeinalzadeh A, Nazary-Moghadam S, Sayyed Hoseinian SH, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Imani E, ...
  • Froud R, Abel G. Using ROC curves to choose minimally important ...
  • DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two ...
  • Young IA, Cleland JA, Michener LA, Brown C. Reliability, construct validity, ...
  • Young BA, Walker MJ, Strunce JB, Boyles RE, Whitman JM, Childs ...
  • Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM. Psychometric properties of the Neck ...
  • Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA. The reliability and ...
  • Demoulin C, Ostelo R, Knottnerus JA, Smeets RJ. Quebec Back Pain ...
  • Pool JJ, Ostelo RW, Hoving JL, Bouter LM, de Vet ...
  • Johansen JB, Roe C, Bakke E, Mengshoel AM, Andelic N. Reliability ...
  • Stewart M, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Bogduk N, Nicholas M. Responsiveness ...
  • Bremerich FH, Grob D, Dvorak J, Mannion AF. The Neck ...
  • Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain ...
  • Juul T, Søgaard K, Davis AM, Roos EM. Psychometric properties of ...
  • Li P, Ning N, Liu H, et al. Responsiveness of ...
  • Cook CE. Clinimetrics corner: the minimal clinically important change score (MCID): ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع