Assessment of the Therapeutic Performance of a Selected Medical University Based On Driving Indices Using the AHP-TOPSIS Approach

Publish Year: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 74

This Paper With 9 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_EBHPME-7-3_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 27 آذر 1402

Abstract:

Background: The assessment of the performance of medical universities as one of the main organizations providing healthcare services is of utmost significance. In this regard, the indices of treatment domain play a fundamental role in promoting health indices and affect the overall performance of the medical university. The present study evaluated the performance of a selected university of medical sciences in Iran based on treatment driving indices with the AHP-TOPSIS approach. Methods: This research applied a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. In this study, first the driving indices were identified and weighted, and then the performance was analyzed according to the indices. The statistical population of the research consisted of key experts in the validation and weighting phase and of nine years of information pertaining to one of the medical universities of Iran in the final phase. The instrument used in the study was the Index Collection Form. Prioritization of indices was done by AHP method using Expert Choice and Excel. TOPSIS model were used to evaluate performance. Results: In the first step, using a review study, ۱۱۱ indices were identified, and in the validation stage, ۱۰ indices of treatment domain were selected. Then, based on hierarchical analysis and pairwise comparisons in the weighted indices, the highest weight or priority pertained to the index of the ratio of the total nursing staff to the available beds with a weight of ۰.۱۶۱ and the lowest weight or priority related to the index of natural delivery to all deliveries with a weight of ۰.۰۴۹. According to the TOPSIS method, the selected university showed the highest performance (۰.۲۲۸) in ۲۰۱۴ and the lowest performance (۰.۰۰۶) in ۲۰۱۷. Conclusion: Considering strategic measures in the deputy of treatment simultaneously to improve and manage research indices over time can improve the performance of universities. Thus, it is appropriate to monitor the indices periodically and in the order of priority, so that in addition to maintaining the efficiency, especially in the indices related to human resources, the effectiveness of the measures, including the improvement of the functional indices of the treatment domain, can also be improved.

Keywords:

University of Medical Sciences , Treatment Index , TOPSIS , AHP , Performance Assessment

Authors

Abbasali Dehghani Tafti

Department of Health in Disaster and Emergencies, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

Mehdi Raadabadi

Health Policy and Management Research Center, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

Amir Houshang Mehrparvar

Department of Occupational Medicine, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

Maryam Shayegh

Health Policy and Management Research Center, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

Mehdi Khayatan

Research and Technology Department, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

Hossein Abolhosseini

Department of Traditional Medicine, School of Traditional Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Alamtabriz A, Imanipour M. Measuring the Relative Efficiency of Health ...
  • Nel E, Rogerson C, editors. Re-thinking spatial inequalities in South ...
  • Wilson J, Tyedmers P, Pelot R. Contrasting and comparing sustainable ...
  • Movahedi M, Hajarizadeh B, Rahimi A, Arshinchi M, Amirhosseini K, ...
  • Azar A, Faraji H. Fuzzy management science. Iranian center of ...
  • Lemke A. Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal ...
  • Jenkins MW, Sugden S. Human development report ۲۰۰۶. New York: ...
  • Darko A, Chan APC, Ameyaw EE, Owusu EK, Pärn E, ...
  • Phibbs CS, Mark DH, Luft HS, Peltzman-Rennie DJ, Garnick DW, ...
  • Roh CY, Lee KH, Fottler MD. Determinants of hospital choice ...
  • Badiee Aval S, Adel A, Hosseini SJ, Ebrahimipour H, Askarzadeh ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع