Assessment of Adherence of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Published in Radiology Journals to STARD Statement Indexed in Web of Science, PubMed & Scopus in ۲۰۱۵

Publish Year: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 34

This Paper With 14 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JBPE-8-3_010

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 30 دی 1402

Abstract:

Rationale and Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the methodological adherence of diagnostic accuracy studies published in radiology journals, which were indexed in different databases with the STARD standard guide ۲۰۱۵.Materials and Methods: The different databases were searched in order to find suitable journals. Among ۸۴ English radiology journals, ۳۱ journal were selected randomly. In order to find the articles, the same search fields and search terms were used. All the items of STARD checklist ۲۰۱۵ were considered to take in to account in assessment of the adherence of the articles to the standard. Total STARD score for each article was calculated by summing the number of reported items.Results: ۱۵۱ articles from ۳۱ journals were evaluated to check the adherence of their structure to STARD standard. Based on the results the articles had the most adherence with the STARD standard in material and method part the item of participants, discussion section, and title or abstract. On the contrary, most of the articles were not adhere to other information which are new items in STARD ۲۰۱۵. Among radiology diagnostic accuracy articles only one article (۰.۶۶%) had a registration number and ۱۰ (۶.۶۲%) articles had a link to full study protocol. More than ۶۰% of articles adhered to the ethics (۶۹.۵۴%) and source of support (۶۳.۵۸%).Conclusions: The radiology diagnostic accuracy studies were adhered to ۶۹.۴۵% STARD items, which shows an improvement in reporting the diagnostic accuracy articles in comparison to previous studies.

Authors

F Zarei

Department of Medical Journalism, School of Para-Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

B Zeinali-Rafsanjani

Medical Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Di Nisio M, Smidt N, van ...
  • Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, ...
  • Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, ...
  • Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, Ostelo RW, ...
  • Siddiqui MA, Azuara-Blanco A, Burr J. The quality of reporting ...
  • Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, Ostelo RW, ...
  • Coppus SF, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, Mol BW. ...
  • Roposch A, Moreau NM, Uleryk E, Doria AS. Developmental dysplasia ...
  • Johnston KC, Holloway RG. There is nothing staid about STARD: ...
  • Johnson ZK, Siddiqui MA, Azuara-Blanco A. The quality of reporting ...
  • Smidt N, Overbeke J, de Vet H, Bossuyt P. Endorsement ...
  • Wilczynski NL. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: no ...
  • Fontela PS, Pant Pai N, Schiller I, Dendukuri N, Ramsay ...
  • Areia M, Soares M, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Quality reporting of endoscopic ...
  • Selman TJ, Morris RK, Zamora J, Khan KS. The quality ...
  • Zintzaras E, Papathanasiou AA, Ziogas DC, Voulgarelis M. The reporting ...
  • Korevaar DA, Wang J, van Enst WA, Leeflang MM, Hooft ...
  • Boursier J, de Ledinghen V, Poynard T, Guechot J, Carrat ...
  • Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for ...
  • Hu ZD. STARD guideline in diagnostic accuracy tests: perspective from ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع