Comparison of Diagnostic Value of ESR, CRP and Leukocytosis with Pathologic Findings among Patients with Acute Appendicitis

Publish Year: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 36

متن کامل این Paper منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل Paper (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJHS-3-4_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 29 بهمن 1402

Abstract:

Background: Acute appendicitis is a serious condition that is occasionally falsely diagnosed. The correct diagnosis of this condition helps reduce unnecessary surgeries or complications due to the lack of diagnosis. Laboratory tests are used to diagnose this condition. The present study was conducted to compare the diagnostic value of the ESR, the CRP level and leukocytosis with pathological findings in patients with acute appendicitis.Methods: This descriptive study examined ۱۲۵ cases with a primary diagnosis of appendicitis from August ۲۰۱۵ to October ۲۰۱۶ at Imam Hossein Hospital in Shahroud, Iran. The patients’ blood samples were collected for ESR, CRP and leukocyte testing and were then sent to the laboratory. After the appendectomies, samples of their appendices were sent to the pathology laboratory for further examination. The blood test results were compared with the pathological findings and analyzed in terms of sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values.Results: In this study, ۵۹.۲% of the cases were male and the rest were female. Acute appendicitis and other pathological appendices were confirmed in ۹۱ patients (۷۲.۸%) based on their pathological evaluation and ۳۴ cases (۲۷.۲%) were reported as normal. The sensitivity and specificity were obtained as ۵۷.۱% and ۷۹.۴% for ESR. These indices were ۷۸.۰% and ۸۳.۵% for CRP and ۷۴.۴% and ۵۰% for leukocytosis.Conclusions: The results of this study showed that, in addition to basic laboratory findings, ESR, CRP and leukocytosis testing can also be helpful in the correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis; however, the predictive value of CRP was the highest.Background: Acute appendicitis is a serious condition that is occasionally falsely diagnosed. The correct diagnosis of this condition helps reduce unnecessary surgeries or complications due to the lack of diagnosis. Laboratory tests are used to diagnose this condition. The present study was conducted to compare the diagnostic value of the ESR, the CRP level and leukocytosis with pathological findings in patients with acute appendicitis. Methods: This descriptive study examined ۱۲۵ cases with a primary diagnosis of appendicitis from August ۲۰۱۵ to October ۲۰۱۶ at Imam Hossein Hospital in Shahroud, Iran. The patients’ blood samples were collected for ESR, CRP and leukocyte testing and were then sent to the laboratory. After the appendectomies, samples of their appendices were sent to the pathology laboratory for further examination. The blood test results were compared with the pathological findings and analyzed in terms of sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values. Results: In this study, ۵۹.۲% of the cases were male and the rest were female. Acute appendicitis and other pathological appendices were confirmed in ۹۱ patients (۷۲.۸%) based on their pathological evaluation and ۳۴ cases (۲۷.۲%) were reported as normal. The sensitivity and specificity were obtained as ۵۷.۱% and ۷۹.۴% for ESR. These indices were ۷۸.۰% and ۸۳.۵% for CRP and ۷۴.۴% and ۵۰% for leukocytosis. Conclusions: The results of this study showed that, in addition to basic laboratory findings, ESR, CRP and leukocytosis testing can also be helpful in the correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis; however, the predictive value of CRP was the highest.

Authors

Sakineh Abedi ۱

۱. General Practitioner, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.

Mehdi Ebrahimi ۲

۲. Dept. of Surgery, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.

Pouneh Zolfaghari ۱

۲. General Practitioner, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.

Javad Nourian ۳

۳. Dept. of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.

Mrayam Yarmohammadi ۴

۴. Dept. of Pathology, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.

Elahe Yahyaei ۵

۵. Shahroud University Medical and Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.