سیویلیکا را در شبکه های اجتماعی دنبال نمایید.

Prioritizing policy tools to support development of IoT technologies in Iran

Publish Year: 1402
Type: Journal paper
Language: English
View: 169

This Paper With 15 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

Export:

Link to this Paper:

Document National Code:

JR_IJIEN-3-2_006

Index date: 28 February 2024

Prioritizing policy tools to support development of IoT technologies in Iran abstract

The Internet of Things is a new perspective on the information technology industry that encompasses all technical, social and economic concepts. Identifying priority application areas for this technology is one of the key points for its effective use. Governments also have a variety of tools for policy-making to support the development of this technology. Therefore, knowing which tool has a higher priority for support is a very important point that can not only prevent the loss of resources but also improve the speed of development. In this research, using the opinion of experts and using the TOPSIS method, an attempt has been made to identify the priority of IoT application areas as well as the priority of government support policy tools in these areas. The results of this research have shown that the important areas in this field respectively are Smart cities, Factories and industries, Shipping, Healthcare, Supply chain management, Buildings and houses and finally Agriculture and animal husbandry. Also Government policy tools respectively, in order of priority, are Financial and Investment Incentives, Flexible regulatory, Tax Exemption, Deploying IOT applications in E-government, Standards and Accreditation, Technology Infrastructure, Macro Policies, Application Infrastructure, Cybersecurity Regulation, Privacy Regulation.The Internet of Things is a new perspective on the information technology industry that encompasses all technical, social and economic concepts. Identifying priority application areas for this technology is one of the key points for its effective use. Governments also have a variety of tools for policy-making to support the development of this technology. Therefore, knowing which tool has a higher priority for support is a very important point that can not only prevent the loss of resources but also improve the speed of development. In this research, using the opinion of experts and using the TOPSIS method, an attempt has been made to identify the priority of IoT application areas as well as the priority of government support policy tools in these areas. The results of this research have shown that the important areas in this field respectively are Smart cities, Factories and industries, Shipping, Healthcare, Supply chain management, Buildings and houses and finally Agriculture and animal husbandry. Also Government policy tools respectively, in order of priority, are Financial and Investment Incentives, Flexible regulatory, Tax Exemption, Deploying IOT applications in E-government, Standards and Accreditation, Technology Infrastructure, Macro Policies, Application Infrastructure, Cybersecurity Regulation, Privacy Regulation.

Prioritizing policy tools to support development of IoT technologies in Iran Keywords:

Prioritizing policy tools to support development of IoT technologies in Iran authors

Mostafa Mohseni Kiasari *

Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

Kiarash Fartash

Assistant Professor, Institute for Science and Technology Studies, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
• Aliahmadi, A., Nozari, H., & Ghahremani-Nahr, J. (2022c). A ...
• Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The ...
• Bandyopadhyay, D., & Sen, J. (2011). Internet of Things: ...
• Berhad, M. (2014). Technology Park Malaysia. National Internet of ...
• Chen, J. W., E.; Lafferty, B., McReynolds, J., Green, ...
• ETSI. (2013). http://www.etsi.org ...
• European-Commission. (2017). Germany Industrie 4.0, Digital Transformation Monitor. E. ...
• fallah, M., Sadeghi, M. e., & Nozari, H. (2021). ...
• Giusto, D., Iera, A., Morabito, G., & Atzori, L. ...
• Government-of-India. (2016). IoT Policy Document. G. o. India. http://meity.gov.in/sites/upload_files/dit/files/Draft-IoT-Policy%20(1).pdf ...
• Höller, J., Tsiatsis, V., Mulligan, C., Karnouskos, S., Avesand, ...
• Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute ...
• IDC. (2019). Saudi Arabia Internet of Things Market Forecast ...
• IERC. (2013). Coordinating and Building a Broadly Based Consensus ...
• Iran-Digital-Economy-Database. (2020). Patent for all technologies. http://digitalstat.ir/main2.php ...
• Iran-IoT-Research-Center. (2020). Definitions and Concepts of IoT. http://iotiran.com/about-iot/definitions ...
• Li, S., Xu, L. D., & Zhao, S. (2015). ...
• McKinsey-Global-Institute. (2015). The Internet of Things: Mapping the Value ...
• Momeni, M., & Sharifi salim, A. (2011). Multi–Criteria Decision–Making ...
• Mousakhani, M., Saghafi, F., Hasanzade, M., & sadeghi, m. ...
• Mousakhani, M., Saghafi, F., Hasanzadeh, M., & Sadeghi, M. ...
• MSIP. (2014). Master Plan for Building the Korean Korean ...
• Nozari, H., Sadeghi, M., Eskandari, J., & Ghorbani, E. ...
• Nozari, H., Sadeghi, M. E., & Najafi, S. E. ...
• Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by ...
• Sadeghi, M. E., Nozari, H., Khajezadeh Dezfoli, H., & ...
• Suresh, P., Daniel, J. V., Parthasarathy, V., & Aswathy, ...
• Team, F. (2018). China's Internet of Things and Rising ...
• Vermesan, O., Friess, P., & Publishers, R. (2014). Internet ...
• Voas, J. (2016). Networks of ‘things’. NIST Special Publication, ...
نمایش کامل مراجع