Prophethood and Administration in Imam Mohammad Ghazali’s Political Thought

Publish Year: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 25

This Paper With 23 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JIPS-5-2_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 اردیبهشت 1403

Abstract:

The present study aimed at exploring the prophethood and administration in Imam Mohammad Ghazali’s political thought. The research method was descriptive-analytical and the results showed that the foundation of Ghazali’s political thought is priority of Sharia. The point worth noting is that the way Sharia is preferred in Ghazali’s thought is a posteriori. Ghazali considers politics from the perspective of the human’s material life. Finally, he turns to the reforming mission of politics and explains the correlation between politics and piety under the inner attitude and the concept of reformation in individual and social life. Ghazali discusses prophethood in various forms, but what manifests itself in his final thought is paying attention to one’s heart, inner side and insight in prophethood. Paying attention to one’s inner side is Ghazali’s solution for reconciling religion and world. He also, like other Muslim thinkers, maintains that true felicity is the felicity in hereafter. He considers the way to achieve that important goal to be not imitating and repeating a practice in its outer form; rather, he searches for it inside one’s heart, the heartfelt belief and inner purity. Ghazali must be considered as an inquirer who was seeking sincerity and divine proximity up to the end of his life. He considered this proximity in resorting to the Prophet as God’s supreme creature. He compensates the Prophet’s absence by resorting to mysticism, inner attitude and moral loyalty to the prophetic teachings. He maintains that the solution to society’s problems is in the hands of the religious scholars and rulers who have made firm decision to reform the situation.

Authors

Tayebeh Mohammadi Kia

Assistant Professor, Research Center of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Ghazali, M. (۱۸۶۶). Faḍāʾiḥ al-Bāṭ Cairo: al-Dar al-Furmiya al-Tiba‘a wal-Nashr. ...
  • Ghazali, M. (۱۹۹۸). Bidāyat al-Hidayat (anno. Darvish, ‘A. M.). Beirut: ...
  • Ghazali, M. (۲۰۰۰). Tahāfut al-Falāsifa: Qaddama Lahū wa Ḍabaṭa Naṣṣahū: ...
  • Poor-Javadi, N. A. (۲۰۰۲). Du Mujaddid: Pazhūhishhāyī darbārayi Muhammad Ghazālī ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع