سیویلیکا را در شبکه های اجتماعی دنبال نمایید.

Successive Intermodal Ensembling: A Promising Approach to Improve the Performance of Data Mining Models for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment (A case study: Kolijan Rostaq Watershed, Iran)

Publish Year: 1399
Type: Journal paper
Language: English
View: 34

This Paper With 12 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

Export:

Link to this Paper:

Document National Code:

JR_ECOPER-8-2_001

Index date: 22 December 2024

Successive Intermodal Ensembling: A Promising Approach to Improve the Performance of Data Mining Models for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment (A case study: Kolijan Rostaq Watershed, Iran) abstract

Aims: In the present study, random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) were used to assess the applicability of ensemble modeling in landslide susceptibility assessment across the Kolijan Rostaq Watershed in Mazandaran Province, Iran. Materials & Methods: Both models were used in two modeling modes: 1) A solitary use (i.e., SVM and RF) and 2) Their ensemble with a bivariate statistical model named the weights of evidence (WofE) which then generated two more models, namely SVM-WofE and RF-WofE. Further, the resulting maps of each stage were dually coupled using the weighted arithmetic mean operation and an intermodal blending of the previous stages. Findings: Accuracy of the models was assessed via the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves based on which the goodness-of-fit of the SVM and the SVM-WofE models were 0.817 and 0.841, respectively, while their respective prediction accuracy values were found to be 0.848 and 0.825. The goodness-of-fit of the RF and the RF-WofE models respectively was 0.9 and 0.823, while their respective prediction accuracy values were found to be 0.886 and 0.823. The goodness-of-fit and prediction power of SVM and SVM-WofE ensemble were respectively 0.859 and 0.873. The same increasing pattern was evident for the ensemble of RF and RF-WofE where their goodness-of-fit and prediction power increased, respectively, up to 0.928 and 0.873. Moreover, the goodness-of-fit and prediction power of RF-SVM ensemble were increased up to 0.932 and 0.899, respectively. The results of the averaged Kappa values throughout a 10-fold cross-validation test as an auxiliary accuracy assessment attested to the same results obtained from the ROC curves. Conclusion: Successive intermodal ensembling approach is a simple and self-explanatory method so far as the context of many data mining techniques with a highly complex structure has been simply benefitted from the weighted averaging technique.

Successive Intermodal Ensembling: A Promising Approach to Improve the Performance of Data Mining Models for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment (A case study: Kolijan Rostaq Watershed, Iran) Keywords:

Successive Intermodal Ensembling: A Promising Approach to Improve the Performance of Data Mining Models for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment (A case study: Kolijan Rostaq Watershed, Iran) authors

F. Adineh

Forest, Range & Watershed Management Department, Natural Resources and Environment Faculty, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

B. Motamedvaziri

Forest, Range & Watershed Management Department, Natural Resources and Environment Faculty, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

H. Ahmadi

Reclamation of Arid & Mountainous Regions Department, Agriculture Faculty, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

A. Moeini

Forest, Range & Watershed Management Department, Natural Resources and Environment Faculty, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
Radbruch-Hall DH, Varnes DJ. Landslides-cause and effect. Bull Int Assoc ...
Van Westen CJ, Van Asch TW, Soeters R. Landslide hazard ...
Brenning A. Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: Review, comparison ...
Yao X, Tham LG, Dai FC. Landslide susceptibility mapping based ...
Pourghasemi HR, Jirandeh AG, Pradhan B, Xu C, Gokceoglu C. ...
Jebur MN, Pradhan B, Tehrany MS. Manifestation of LiDAR-derived parameters ...
Ren F, Wu X, Zhang K, Niu R. Application of ...
Bui DT, Tuan TA, Klempe H, Pradhan B, Revhaug I. ...
Huang Y, Zhao L. Review on landslide susceptibility mapping using ...
Mohammady M, Pourghasemi HR, Amiri M. Assessment of land subsidence ...
Prasad AM, Iverson LR, Liaw A. Newer classification and regression ...
Strobl C, Boulesteix AL, Kneib T, Augustin T, Zeileis A. ...
Bachmair S, Weiler M. Hillslope characteristics as controls of subsurface ...
Vorpahl P, Elsenbeer H, Märker M, Schröder B. How can ...
Catani F, Lagomarsino D, Segoni S, Tofani V. Landslide susceptibility ...
Pourghasemi HR, Kerle N. Random forests and evidential belief function-based ...
Naghibi SA, Pourghasemi HR, Dixon B. GIS-based groundwater potential mapping ...
Pourtaghi ZS, Pourghasemi HR, Aretano R, Semeraro T. Investigation of ...
Golkarian A, Naghibi SA, Kalantar B, Pradhan B. Groundwater potential ...
Mohammady M, Pourghasemi HR, Amiri M. Land subsidence susceptibility assessment ...
Zarei P, Talebi A, Alaie Taleghani M. Sensitivity analysis of ...
Nafarzadegan AR, Talebi A, Malekinezhad H, Emami N. Antecedent rainfall ...
O’brien RM. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance ...
Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. ۲۰۰۱;۴۵(۱):۵-۳۲. ...
Calle ML, Urrea V. Letter to the editor: Stability of ...
Nicodemus KK. Letter to the editor: On the stability and ...
Jakkula V. Tutorial on support vector machine (svm). Washington DC.; ...
Joachims T. Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with ...
Brown MP, Grundy WN, Lin D, Cristianini N, Sugnet CW, ...
Cristianini N, Scholkopf B. Support vector machines and kernel methods: ...
Huang C, Davis LS, Townshend JR. An assessment of support ...
Guo Q, Kelly M, Graham CH. Support vector machines for ...
Statnikov A. A gentle introduction to support vector machines in ...
Statnikov A, Aliferis CF, Hardin DP, Guyon I. A gentle ...
Kecman V. Support vector machines-an introduction. In: Support vector machines: ...
Marjanović M, Kovačević M, Bajat B, Voženílek V. Landslide susceptibility ...
Bonham-Carter GF, Agterberg FP, Wright DF. Integration of geological datasets ...
Van Westen CJ. Geo-information tools for landslide risk assessment: An ...
Kornejady A, Ownegh M, Rahmati O, Bahremand A. Landslide susceptibility ...
Pontius Jr RG, Schneider LC. Land-cover change model validation by ...
Kuhn M. The caret package. R Foundation for Statistical Computing ...
Lombardo L, Cama M, Maerker M, Rotigliano E. A test ...
Lombardo L, Cama M, Conoscenti C, Märker M, Rotigliano EJ. ...
Lombardo L, Fubelli G, Amato G, Bonasera M. Presence-only approach ...
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: JohnWiley& ...
نمایش کامل مراجع