سیویلیکا را در شبکه های اجتماعی دنبال نمایید.

Pragmatic Instruction and Speaking Ability of Iraqi EFL Learners in Virtual vs. Face-to-face Classroom Contexts: Expressive, Declarative, and Directive Speech Acts in Focus

Publish Year: 1403
Type: Journal paper
Language: English
View: 60

This Paper With 18 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

Export:

Link to this Paper:

Document National Code:

JR_ELT-16-34_002

Index date: 12 January 2025

Pragmatic Instruction and Speaking Ability of Iraqi EFL Learners in Virtual vs. Face-to-face Classroom Contexts: Expressive, Declarative, and Directive Speech Acts in Focus abstract

This study was an attempt to see whether the instruction of pragmatic markers in virtual vs. face-to-face classroom settings had any effect on Iraqi EFL learners’ speaking ability. It also attempted to examine the intervening effects of some factors including age (teenagers in the language institute vs. adults in the university), gender, social class, and the learners’ English language proficiency levels.  To achieve these purposes, a group of 224 Iraqi EFL learners at a university and a private language institute in Kufa, Iraq passing conversation courses were selected and randomly divided into four groups. The two experimental groups (both in university and language institute settings) received instruction on pragmatic markers in online vs. face-to-face conversation classrooms while the two control groups (in university and language institute settings) did not receive instruction on pragmatic markers in online vs. face-to-face conversation classrooms. An English language speaking test was given to the learners to assess their oral performance before and after the treatment. The test was randomly selected from IELTS speaking tests. For the teenagers in the language institute, a simplified speaking task was designed based on IELTS criteria for assessing speaking performance. The results indicated that generally those who received pragmatic instruction outperformed those who did not receive such kind of instruction and the participants in face-to-face classrooms outperformed their virtual counterparts in terms of speaking ability. The study also examined the intervening effects of some social and personal factors including age, gender, social class and level of language proficiency. Based on the findings of this study, the male participants and the students from higher proficiency levels outperformed females and their lower proficiency counterparts in terms of speaking ability. However, they did not show any differences with regard to age and social class. This study offers important implications for EFL teachers, learners and material designers, with regard to the promising effect of face-to-face instruction of different pragmatic features of language through speech acts on learners’ speaking skill.

Pragmatic Instruction and Speaking Ability of Iraqi EFL Learners in Virtual vs. Face-to-face Classroom Contexts: Expressive, Declarative, and Directive Speech Acts in Focus Keywords:

Pragmatic Instruction and Speaking Ability of Iraqi EFL Learners in Virtual vs. Face-to-face Classroom Contexts: Expressive, Declarative, and Directive Speech Acts in Focus authors

Hussein Al Khafaji

Department of English Language and Literature, University of Isfahan, Iran.

Zahra Amirian

Department of English Language and Literature, University of Isfahan, Iran

Mohammad Amiryousefi

Department of English Language and Literature, University of Isfahan, Iran

Abbas Sultan

Department of English Language, University of Kufa, Iraq

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
Abolfathiasl, H., and Abdullah, A. N. (۲۰۱۵). Pragmatic consciousness-raising activities ...
Aijmer, K. (۲۰۱۳). Understanding pragmatic markers: A variational pragmatic approach. ...
Aliakbari, M. & Mahjoob, E. (۲۰۱۶). The Relationship between Age ...
Alipour, F., Youhanaee, M., Barati, H., & Nasirahmadi, A. (۲۰۱۵). ...
Allan, D. (۲۰۰۴). Oxford Placement Test. Oxford University Press ...
Alsuhaibani, Z. (۲۰۲۲). Developing EFL students’ pragmatic competence: The case ...
Andersen, G. (۲۰۰۱). Pragmatic markers and sociolinguistic variation: A relevance-theoretic ...
Birjandi, P., & Soleimani, M. M. (۲۰۱۳). Assessing language learners’ ...
Blakemore, D. (۲۰۰۲). Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics a ...
markers. Cambridge University Press ...
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (۲۰۰۶). Cambridge grammar of English: ...
Chen, J. C. (۲۰۱۶). The crossroads of English language learners, ...
Chun, D., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (۲۰۱۶). Technology in ...
Davarzani, F., and Talebzadeh, H. (۲۰۲۰). The effect of Virtual ...
Derakhshan, A., & Arabmofrad, A. (۲۰۱۸). The impact of instruction ...
Erman, B. (۲۰۰۱). Pragmatic markers revisited with a focus on ...
Fazilatfar, A. M. & Cheraghi, M. (۲۰۱۳). Exploring the effects ...
Fernández, J., Gates Tapia, A., & Lu, X. (۲۰۱۴). Oral ...
Fraser, B. (۲۰۰۹). An account of discourse markers. International Review ...
Gabarro-Lopez, S. (۲۰۱۹). Are discourse markers related to age and ...
Gilmore, A. (۲۰۰۴). A comparison of textbooks and authentic interactions. ...
Hedia, M. M. H. (۲۰۱۶). Enhancing Speaking Skills of EFL ...
Hellermann, J., & Vergun, A. (۲۰۰۷). Language which is not ...
Islam, M. Sh. and Stapa, M. (۲۰۲۱). Students’ low proficiency ...
Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (۱۹۹۶). Developmental issues in interlanguage ...
Knott, A. & Dale, R. (۱۹۹۴), Using linguistic Phenomena to motivate ...
Lewis, G. (۲۰۰۴). The internet and young learners. Oxford University ...
Li, W. (۲۰۱۵). Effective teaching in the use of pragmatic ...
Liao, S. (۲۰۰۹). Variation in the use of discourse markers ...
Liu, J. (۲۰۱۲). Assessing EFL Learners’ interlanguage pragmatic knowledge: Implications ...
Magliacane, A., & Howard, M. (۲۰۱۹). The role of learner ...
Müller, S. (۲۰۰۵). Discourse markers in native and non-native English ...
Neary-Sundquist, C. (۲۰۱۴). The use of pragmatic markers across proficiency ...
Petraki, E., & Bayes, S. (۲۰۱۳). Teaching oral requests: An ...
Nasri, M., Shafiee, S, and Sepehri, M. (۲۰۲۲). An Account ...
Nguyen, T.T.M., Pham, T.H., & Pham, M.T. (۲۰۱۲). The relative ...
Rose, K. R. (۱۹۹۴). Pragmatic consciousness-raising in an EFL context. ...
Schauer, G. A. (۲۰۰۶). Pragmatic Awareness in ESL and EFL ...
Schiffrin, D. (۱۹۸۷). Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press ...
Seedhouse, P., Nakatsuhara, F. (۲۰۱۸). The Discourse of the IELTS ...
Seth, A., Okpatah, B., Richard, A., Coffie, A. J., & ...
Stubbs, M. (۱۹۸۳). Discourse analysis. The University of Chicago Press ...
Taguchi, N. (۲۰۱۵). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional ...
Takahashi, S. (۲۰۰۱). The role of input enhancement in developing ...
Uso-Juan, E. (۲۰۱۰). The presentation and practice of the communicative ...
Vellenga, H. (۲۰۰۴). Learning Pragmatics from ESL & EFL Textbooks: ...
Yoonjung, Ch., Na Young, K. and Hea-Suk, K. (۲۰۲۲). Effects ...
Yuan, F. (۲۰۱۸). Roles of action research in the professional ...
Zand-Moghadam, A., & Adeh, A. (۲۰۲۰). Investigating Pragmatic Competence, Meta-pragmatic ...
نمایش کامل مراجع