Different References for Valgus Cut Angle in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Publish Year: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 346

This Paper With 5 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TABO-6-4_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 تیر 1398

Abstract:

Background: The valgus cut angle (VCA) of the distal femur in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is measured preoperativelyon three-joint alignment radiographs. The anatomical axis of the femur can be described as the anatomical axis of thefull length of the femur or as the anatomical axis of the distal half of the femur, which may result in different anglesin some cases. During TKA, the anatomical axis of the femur is determined by intramedullary femoral guides, whichmay follow the distal half or near full anatomical axis, based on the length of the femoral guide. The aim of this studywas to compare using the anatomical axis of the full length of the femur versus the anatomical axis of the distal half ofthe femur for measuring VCA, in normal and varus aligned femurs. We hypothesized that the VCA would be differentbased upon these two definitions of the anatomical axis of the femur.Methods: Full-length weight bearing radiographs were used to determine three-joint alignment in normal aligned(Lateral Distal Femoral Angle; LDFA = 87º ± 2º) and varus aligned (LDFA > 89º) femurs. Full-length anatomical axismechanicalaxis angle (angle 1) and distal half anatomical axis-mechanical axis angle (angle 2) were measured inall subjects by two independent orthopedic surgeons using a DICOM viewer software (PACS). Angles 1 and 2 werecompared in normal and varus aligned subjects to determine whether there was a significant difference.Results: Ninety-seven consecutive subjects with normally aligned femurs and 97 consecutive subjects with varusaligned femurs were included in this study. In normally aligned femurs, the mean value of angle 1 was 5.05° ± 0.76°and for angle 2 was 3.62° ± 1.19°, which were statistically different (P= 0.0001). In varus aligned femurs, the meanvalue of angle 1 was 5.42° ± 0.85° and for angle 2 was 4.23° ± 1.27°, which were also statistically different (P=0.0047).Conclusion: The two different methods of outlining the anatomical axis of the femur lead to different results inboth normal and varus-aligned femurs. This should be considered in determination of the valgus cut angle on preoperativeradiographs and be adjusted according to the length of the intramedullary guide.

Authors

Hamidreza Yazdi

Department of knee Surgery, Firoozgar Hospital, Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Ara Nazarian

Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies at BIDMC - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Jim Wu

BIDMC, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Arash Amiri

Department of knee Surgery, Firoozgar Hospital, Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran