Genetic Properties of Some Economic Traits in Isfahan Native Fowl Using Bayesian and REML Methods

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 280

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_PSJG-3-2_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 مهر 1398

Abstract:

The objective of the present study was to estimate heritability values for some performance and egg quality traits of native fowl in Isfahan breeding center using REML and Bayesian approaches. The records were about 51521 and 975 for performance and egg quality traits, respectively. At the first step, variance components were estimated for body weight at hatch (BW0), body weight at 8 weeks of age (BW8), weight at sexual maturity (WSM), egg yolk weight (YW), egg Haugh unit and eggshell thickness, via REML approach using ASREML software. At the second step, the same traits were analyzed via Bayesian approach using Gibbs3f90 software. In both approaches six different animal models were applied and the best model was determined using likelihood ratio test (LRT) and deviance information criterion (DIC) for REML and Bayesian approaches, respectively. Heritability estimates for BW0, WSM and ST were the same in both approaches. For BW0, LRT and DIC indexes confirmed that the model consisting maternal genetic, permanent environmental and direct genetic effects was significantly better than other models. For WSM, a model consisting of maternal permanent environmental effect in addition to direct genetic effect was the best. For shell thickness, the basic model consisting direct genetic effect was the best. The results for BW8, YW and Haugh unit, were different between the two approaches. The reason behind this tiny differences was that the convergence could not be achieved for some models in REML approach and thus for these traits the Bayesian approach estimated the variance components more accurately. The results indicated that ignoring maternal effects, overestimates the direct genetic variance and heritability for most of the traits. Also, the Bayesian-based software could take more variance components into account.

Authors

Salehinasab M

Department of Animal Genetic and Breeding, Faculty of Animal Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

Latifi M

Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.

Zerehdaran S

Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Alijani S

Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Browne WJ & Draper D. 2006. A comparison of Bayesian ...
  • Dabson AJ. 1991. An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. Chapman ...
  • Dana N, Vander Waaij EH & Van Arendonk JAM. 2011. ...
  • Duangjinda M, Misztal I, Bertrand JK & Tsuruta S. 2001. ...
  • Elston RC & Stewart J. 1971. A general model for ...
  • Gelfand AE & Smith AFM. 1990. Sampling-based approaches to calculating ...
  • Ghorbani SH, Kamali MA, Abbasi MA & Ghafouri-Kesbi F. 2012. ...
  • Gianola D & Fernando RL. 1986. Bayesian methods in animal ...
  • Gilmour AR, Cullis BR, Welham SJ & Thompson R. 2000. ...
  • Grosso JLBM, Balieiro JCC, Eler JP, Ferraz JBS, Mattos EC ...
  • Hartmann C, Johansson K, Strandberg E & Rydhmer, L. 2003. ...
  • Le Bihan-Duval E, Mignon-Grasteau S, Millet N & Beaumont C. ...
  • Le Roy P, Elsen JM & Knott S. 1989. Comparison ...
  • Meyer K. 1997. Estimates of genetic parameters for weaning weight ...
  • Misztal I. 1999. GIBBS3F90 Manual. [Link] ...
  • Muir WM, Wong GK, Zhang Y, Wang J, Groenen MA, ...
  • Narinç D, Karaman E, Firat MZ & Aksoy T. 2011. ...
  • Rosa GJM, Padovani CR & Gianola D. 2003. Robust linear ...
  • SAS Institute. 2001. SAS /STAT user’s Guide: statistics. Release 8.2. ...
  • Sanchez MP, Bidanel JP, Zhang S, Naveau J, Burlot T ...
  • Schenkel FS, Schaeffer LR & Boettcher PJ. 2002. Comparison between ...
  • Sorenson DA, Wang CS, Jensen J, Gianola D. 1994. Bayesian ...
  • Unver Y, Akbas Y, Firat MZ & Oguz I. 2002. ...
  • Wang CS, Rutledge JJ & Gianola D. 1993. Marginal inferences ...
  • Wolc A, White IMS, Avendano S & Hill WG. 2009. ...
  • Yousefizonuz A, Alijani S, Rafat SA, Abbasi MA & Daghigh ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع