REVERSE FAULT RUPTURE MITIGATION MEASURES FOR CONTINUOUS SHALLOW TUNNELS

Publish Year: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 145

متن کامل این Paper منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل Paper (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

SEE08_357

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 23 آبان 1399

Abstract:

In recent years, long tunnels for highway, railway, water and hydroelectric purposes are developed in many parts of the world (Alp & Apaydin, 2019). In earthquake-prone areas faulting is one of the hazard risks for these structures. Surface faulting is the propagation of displacement along a fault in soil deposits that reaches the ground surface (Ghalandarzadeh et al., 2016). If the hanging wall moves upwards in relation to the footwall, the fault is called reverse (Twiss & Moores, 1992). Faulting can cause severe damage to tunnels and can stop its operation. Faulting can cause ground settlement, crack in tunnel lining, soil falling and complete collapse (MRl, 2003). The best approach for this situation is avoiding the fault, but for many reasons, we may have to build a structure in the fault zone. In these cases, efforts are made to minimize damage to the injured, and to this end, measures and techniques are used to reduce the damage (Oettle & Bray, 2013). Lifelines such as pipelines and tunnels are stretched over a long length and are more vulnerable to the fault rupture than other structures (Kiani et al., 2016; Moradi & Ghalandarzadeh, 2010; Moradi et al., 2013; Rojhani et al., 2012).The extensive use of tunnels in urban and rural areas for transportation, water transfer and utility is increased the need for paying attention to the phenomenon of fault rupture as a potential risk. The measures of faulting damage mitigation are categorized in two categories of geotechnical and structural measures. Methods such as soil improvement and construction of a trench that act to changes in soil conditions are named geotechnical methods, and methods such as retrofitting where by changing structural conditions, reduce earthquake damages, are structural measures (Ashtiani et al., 2017). Konagai et al. (2006) outlined key points for designing civil-infrastructures near seismic faults. The damage to eight tunnels caused by faulting in Japan, the United States and Turkey has been highlighted. Although the tunnels are vulnerable to activity of faults, research in this area is very limited (Burridge et al., 2016). Russo et al. (2002) claim that there are basically two practical ways to reduce the tunnel damage in the fault activity, one is over excavated and other one is articulated design (Figure 1). Koohrang water conveyance tunnel passes through many active faults in its path. A flexible lining approach consisting of 1500 cm long reinforced concrete segments with an 85 cm distance, which is filled with plastic concrete and a continuous steel lining that prevents water leakage (Figure 2), (Shahidi & Vafaeian, 2005). Here, by running a series of centrifuge tests, several ways to reduce the damage to the tunnels are presented, and the strengths and weaknesses of each one are discussed.

Authors

Mehdi SABAGH

Ph.D. Candidate, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abbas GHALANDARZADEH

Associate Professor, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran