Effects of Audio-Visually Prompted Collaborative Dialogue on EFL Learners' Listening Comprehension Development

Publish Year: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 216

This Paper With 42 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-39-2_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 8 بهمن 1399

Abstract:

This study investigated the comparative effects of audio-visually prompted collaborative dialogue on the listening comprehension development of symmetrical, asymmetrical, and asymmetrical teacher-fronted EFL learner groups. Besides, it explored the attitude of the participants of the groups concerning the effectiveness of collaborative dialogue for their listening comprehension improvement. The participants of the study were 120 Iranian female EFL learners who were conveniently chosen from several English language institutes and put into three experimental and one control groups, each with 30 learners. In the first experimental group, coequal learners engaged in collaborative dialogue. In the second experimental group, the expert peer(s) and less knowledgeable peers applied collaborative dialogue, and in the third experimental group, in addition to the peers, the teacher was involved in collaborative dialogue with the group members. As for the control group, the collaborative dialogue was abandoned and the participants worked individually. Quantitative and qualitative analyses revealed that collaborative dialogue in asymmetrical teacher-fronted, asymmetrical peer and symmetrical peer groups were respectively the most effective procedures for listening comprehension development of the EFL learners. Also, it was found that the participants of the asymmetrical teacher fronted group had a more positive attitude towards the efficacy of audio-visually prompted collaborative dialogue compared with asymmetrical and symmetrical peer groups. The findings underscore the cognitive and affective efficiency of a more knowledgeable source, either a teacher or a peer, in asymmetrical dyadic interactions for the less knowledgeable partners' ZPD sensitive development.   

Authors

Shima Beheshti

English Department, Humanities Faculty, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

Mohammad Ahmadi Safa

English Department, Humanities Faculty, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Ahmadi Safa, M., & Rozati, F. (2017). The impact of ...
  • Ableeva, R. (2008). The effects of dynamic assessment on L2 ...
  • Al-Yami, S.A. (2008). The effectiveness of scaffolding interactive activities in ...
  • Anderson, C. W., Holland, J. D., & Palincsar, A. S. ...
  • Antón, M., & DiCamilla, F. (1999). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 ...
  • Baines, E., P. Blatchford, & P. Kutnick. (2009). Promoting effective ...
  • Baker, M.J. (2020). Types of educational dialogue. Learning, Culture and ...
  • Battistich, V., Solomon, D., & Delucci, K. (1993). Interaction processes ...
  • Bonsignori, V. (2018). Using films and TV series for ESP ...
  • Bruti, S. (2015). Teaching learners how to use pragmatic routines ...
  • Burns, A., & Siegel, J. (2018). International perspectives on teaching ...
  • Cohen, J.W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences ...
  • de la Colina, A. A., & García Mayo, M. (2007). ...
  • DiCamilla, F., & Antón, M. (1997). Repetition in the collaborative ...
  • Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 ...
  • Dobao, A. F. (2016). Peer interaction and learning: A focus ...
  • Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In ...
  • Edstrom, A. (2015). Triads in the L2 classroom: Interaction patterns ...
  • Educational Testing Service (2015). Handbook for the TOEFL junior standard ...
  • Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. New ...
  • Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory ...
  • Fulcher, G. (2010). Practical language testing. London, UK: Hodder Education. ...
  • Garcia, P., & Asencion, Y. (2001). Interlanguage development of Spanish ...
  • Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL ...
  • Gillies, R., & Boyle, M. (2011). Teachers’ reflections of cooperative ...
  • Gillies, R, M. (2019). Promoting academically productive student dialogue during ...
  • Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ...
  • He, X., & Ellis, R. (1999). Modified output and the ...
  • Herrero, C. (2016).The film in language teaching association (FILTA): A ...
  • Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2014). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. ...
  • Kaufman, D. (2004). Constructivist issues in language learning and teaching. ...
  • Khatib, M., & Ahmadi Safa, M. (2011). The effectiveness of ...
  • Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor ...
  • Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (2000). The helping behaviors ...
  • Kowal, M. & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production ...
  • Kowal, M. & Swain, M. (1997). From semantic to syntactic ...
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment ...
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006/2009). Sociocultural theory ...
  • Leeser, M.J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during ...
  • Mennim, P. (2016). A discourse-based evaluation of a classroom peer ...
  • Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analyzing classroom talk as ...
  • Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Major, L. (2020). The Routledge ...
  • McCarthy, S.J. & McMahon, S. (1992). From convention to invention: ...
  • Mcdonough, K., & Sunitham, W. (2009). Collaborative dialogue between Thai ...
  • Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004/2013). Second language learning theories. ...
  • Nassaji, H., & Tian, J. (2010). Collaborative and individual output ...
  • Nishioka, H. (2016). Analyzing language development in a collaborative digital ...
  • Ohta, A.S. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance ...
  • Ohta, A.S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: ...
  • Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2014). Peer interaction ...
  • Philp, J., Walter, S., & Basturkmen, H. (2010). Peer interaction ...
  • Poehner, M, E. (2005). Dynamic assessment of oral proficiency among ...
  • Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to ...
  • Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the ...
  • Scott, V. M., & De la Fuente, M. J. (2008). ...
  • Storch, N. (2001). How collaborative is pair work: ESL tertiary ...
  • Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. ...
  • Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. ...
  • Storch, N. (2007). Investigating the merits of pair work on ...
  • Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in pair ...
  • Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input ...
  • Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language ...
  • Swain, M., (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition ...
  • Swain, M., (2001). Integrating language and content teaching through collaborative ...
  • Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency, and collaboration in advanced second ...
  • Swain, M. (2010). “Talking-it-through”: Languaging as a source of learning. ...
  • Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A., (2002). Peer–peer dialogue ...
  • Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language ...
  • Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through ...
  • Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2013). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as ...
  • Tavakoli, H. (2012). A dictionary of language acquisition: A comprehensive ...
  • Thoms, J., Liao, J., & Szustak, A. (2005). The use ...
  • Toth, P.D. (2011).Social and cognitive factors in making teacher-led classroom ...
  • Villamil, O. S., & Guerrero, M. C. M. de. (1996). ...
  • Villamil, O. S., & Guerrero, M. C. M. de. (1998). ...
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. MA, Cambridge: Harvard ...
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. MA, Cambridge: MIT ...
  • Watanabe, Y. (2008). Peer–peer interaction between L2 learners of different ...
  • Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences ...
  • Webb, S., & Rodgers, H. (2009). The lexical coverage of ...
  • Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: ...
  • Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation ...
  • Woolfolk, A. (2016). Educational Psychology. England, Pearson Education Limited. ...
  • Xu, Y., Gelfer, J., & Perkins, P. (2005). Using peer ...
  • Yule, G. & Macdonald, D. (1990). Resolving referential conflict in ...
  • Zeng, G., & Takatsuka, Sh. (2009). Text-based peer-peer collaborative dialogue ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع