Voice in Short Argumentative Texts Written by Undergraduate Learners of English

Publish Year: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 145

This Paper With 19 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-33-1_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

Abstract:

The present study explored the intensity level of authorial voice in relation to the quality of argumentative writing. ۴۲ undergraduate learners of English as a foreign language (۳۶ girls and ۶ boys) spent ۴۵ minutes to individually complete in-class position-taking writing tasks for three weeks. Their overall academic writing quality scores assigned based on portfolio assessment were studied in relation to their voice expression quantified using a voice intensity rating scale (VIRS). Findings indicated that, among the components of authorial voice, only “assertiveness” showed a positive moderate relationship with academic writing quality (r=۰.۴۵, p≤ ۰.۰۵). In the follow-up qualitative analyses of voice-expression strategies, interviews with participants whose voice intensity had been rated either as the strongest or as the weakest showed nine strategies for voice expression. At the sentence-level, high-voice participants most frequently used intensifiers to express assertiveness, while low-voice writers tried to use other lexico-grammatical tools. At the text-level, both high-voice and low-voice participants were concerned about the effect of the topic on their voice expression. The findings imply that undergraduate English as a foreign language writers do try to express voice and that the required strategies can be one of the targets of EFL writing research and instruction.

Keywords:

Authors

Abbas Zare-ee

University of Kashan

Navvab Hematiyan

University of Kashan

Sajjad Askari Matin

University of Tehran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Atkinson, D. & Ramanathan, V. (1995). Cultures of writing: An ...
  • Atkinson, D. (1997). A critical approach to critical thinking in ...
  • Aziza, Z. & Bab, S. (2011). Instructional leadership enhanced creativity ...
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays, Austin, ...
  • Bowden, D. (1995). The rise of a metaphor: “Voice” in ...
  • DeRemer, M. (1998). Writing assessment: Raters’ elaboration of the rating ...
  • Elbow, P. (1994). Landmark essays on voice and writing. New ...
  • Elbow, P. (1998). Writing With Power: Techniques for Mastering the ...
  • Elbow, P. (1999). Individualism and the teaching of writing: Response ...
  • Fox, H. (1995). Listening to the world: Cultural issues in ...
  •  Gemmell, R. (2008).  Encouraging Student Voice in Academic Writing.  The ...
  • Hamp. Lyons, L. (1995). Rating nonnative writing: The trouble with ...
  • Helms-Park, R. & Stapleton, P. (2003). Questioning the importance of ...
  • Hinkel, E. (1999). Culture in second language teaching and learning. ...
  • Hirvela, A. & Belcher, D. (2001). Coming back to voice: ...
  • Hyland, K. (2002). Options of identity in academic writing. ELT ...
  • Hyland, K. & Guinda, C. S. (2012). Stance and Voice ...
  • Ivanič, R. & Camps, D. (2001). I am how I ...
  • Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, ...
  • Johnston, B. (1996). Linguistic individual: Self expression in language and ...
  • Kachru, Y. (1999). Culrture, context, and writing. In E. Hinkel ...
  • Kristeva, J. (1986). The Kristeva reader. New York: Columbia University ...
  • Matsuda, P. K. (2001). Voice in Japanese written discourse: Implications ...
  • Matsuda, P. K. & Tardy, C. M. (2007). Voice in ...
  • Prior, P. (2001). Voices in text, mind, and society: Sociohistoric ...
  • Ramanathan, V. & Atkinson, D. (1999). Individualism, academic writing, and ...
  • Reid, J. (2001). Advanced EAP writing and curriculum design: What ...
  • Stapleton, P. (2002). Critiquing voice as a viable pedagogical tool ...
  • Stewart, D. C. (1992). Cognitive Psychologists, Social Constructionists, and Three ...
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: Sociocultural approach ...
  • Yeh, S. (1998). Validation of a scheme for assessing argumentative ...
  • Yin, R. K. (2010). Qualitative research from start to finish. ...
  • Zhao, C. G. & Llosa, L. (2008). Voice in high-stakes ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع