Place as an Output of Codes: Importance of Being Place-Character Base of Form-Based Codes

The primary question is the product of form-based codes different in terms place-character? Asecondary question that follows is if this lack of differentiation based on place-character is a resultof the code itself or of issues peripheral to the code. Each place represent a customized interactionbetween a 'code' (conceptual framework) and a 'place' (contextual framework) which could bedescribed as a 'narrative'. Individually dissecting these narratives along specific cross-sections, suchas location, chronology, typology, scale, and fit, could reveal patterns of similarities anddifferences. Research shows that each of these cross-sections impact specific aspects of placecharacterand place-making. Qualitative correlations across codes and cross-sections, could explaincertain patterns observed in the codes along specific cross-sections. It is concluded that the processof place-making could be lost in the melee. While form-based codes appear to be extremelyflexible, this complex condition could prove burdensome for any code or regulation withoutcompromising its place-making potential. Factors in shaping the output of form-based codes areplace, process and the policy framework. In establishing responsiveness to context, the negotiationis between traditions and aspirations, which could be divergent concepts. Yet there is always aparadigm that successfully mediates this condition. Form-based codes present a simple response toa complex set of urban issues, it is important to maintain place-specific context around theapplication of this approach. Another consideration in this mediation could be eliminating zoningbut it is never possible to replace a system of rules with the absence of rules.

Keywords:

Form-Based Code , Place-Making , Place-Character Features , Coding