Sociocultural Identity DevelopmentScaffolded byCollaboration-ConduciveStrategies:A Case of an Iranian EFL Writing Class

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 182

This Paper With 32 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ELT-7-15_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 10 دی 1401

Abstract:

This investigation postulatesVygotsky’s (۱۹۷۸) concept of zone of proximal development (ZPD) and his related “scaffolding” metaphor as well as Norton’s (۲۰۰۶) principles of sociocultural identity as its theoretical foundation.Thisresearchintends to scrutinizethe socioculturally-oriented mediationalmechanisms utilized in student-student and student-teacher collaborationsin an Iranian EFL writing class. Such scrutinyis to reveal the learners’sociocultural change in behavior, and how their sociocultural identity is scaffolded and developed through collaborative negotiation in writing. For this purpose, Lidz's Rating Scale (۱۹۹۱) was adopted to delve into the sociocultural-identity-conducive interactions produced by ۳۲ sophomoresof English Language and Literature at Shiraz University as they collaborated in writing. The analysis of such scaffolding-mediated discourse provides useful insights into the nature of the learners’ sociocultural identity development.Particularly, the results provide evidence that dialogic exchangesthrough linguistic meanson the part of peers and the teacher include some behaviors such as intentionality, joint regard, affective involvement, communicative ratchet, contingent responsivity, intersubjectivity, and L۱ use in collaborative writing taskswhich playthe most significant role in establishing new identities and gaining self-regulation, i.e. developing sociocultural identity.

Authors

سیدمحمدعلی سوزنده فر

Ph.D. Candidate, Shiraz University (Corresponding author)

رحمان صحراگرد

Associate Professor, Shiraz University

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (۱۹۹۴).Negative feedback as regulation ...
  • Anton, M., & DiCamilla, F. (۱۹۹۸). Socio-cognitive functions of L۱ ...
  • Bamberg, M. (۲۰۰۶). Stories, big or small: why do we ...
  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (۱۹۸۲).Qualitative research for ...
  • Canagarajah, A.S. (۱۹۹۹). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: ...
  • Cronbach, L. J. (۱۹۸۴). Essentials of psychological testing. San Francisco: ...
  • De Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. (۲۰۰۰).Activating the ...
  • Dobao, A. (۲۰۱۲). Collaborative writing tasks in the L۲ classroom: ...
  • Donato, R. (۱۹۸۸).Beyond group: A Psycholinguistic rationale for collectivity in ...
  • Donato, R. (۱۹۹۴). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In ...
  • Dunn, W. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (۱۹۹۸).Vygotsky's zone of ...
  • Ellis, R. (۱۹۹۷). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford UK: ...
  • Englert, C. S., Mariage, T. V., & Dunsmore, K. (۲۰۰۶).Tenets ...
  • Esquinca, A. (۲۰۱۱). Bilingual college writers’ collaborative writing of word ...
  • Fernandez, M., Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Rojas-Drummond, S. (۲۰۰۱).Re-conceptualizing ...
  • Frawley, W. (۱۹۹۲). Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates ...
  • Gibbons, P. (۲۰۰۲) Scaffolding language scaffolding learning: Teaching second language ...
  • Grossen, B. (۱۹۹۸). Child-directed teaching methods: A discriminatory practice of ...
  • Kanno, Y. (۲۰۰۳). Negotiating bilingual and bicultural identities: Japanese returnees ...
  • Kanno, Y., & Norton, B. (Guest Eds.)(۲۰۰۳). Imagined communities and ...
  • Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (۲۰۰۲).The effect of interaction in ...
  • Lantolf, J. P. (۲۰۰۰).Second language learning as a mediated process. ...
  • Lantolf, J. P. (۲۰۰۲). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. ...
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Aljaafreh, A. (۱۹۹۵). Second language learning ...
  • Lidz, C. (۱۹۹۱).Practitioner's Guide to Dynamic Assessment. New York: Guilford ...
  • Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (۲۰۰۹). To give is better ...
  • Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (۲۰۰۴).Second language learning theories. London: ...
  • Norton, B. (۲۰۰۶). Identity as a sociocultural construct in second ...
  • Nunnally, J. C., & Berstein, I. H. (۱۹۹۴).Psychometric theory (۳rd ...
  • Nyikos, M., & Hashimoto, R. (۱۹۹۷). Constructivist theory applied to ...
  • Pata, K., Sarapuu, T., & Lehtinen, E. (۲۰۰۵). Tutor scaffolding ...
  • Patton, M. Q. (۱۹۹۰). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (۲nd ...
  • Pennycook, A. (۲۰۰۱). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, ...
  • Prior, P. (۲۰۰۶). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C.A. ...
  • Psarou M. K., & Zafiropoulos, C. (۲۰۰۴).Scietific Research: Theory and ...
  • Rasku-Puttonen H, Etelapelto A, Arvaja M., & Hakkinen P. (۲۰۰۳). ...
  • Roberts, J. (۲۰۰۷). Capturing values: a triangulation of academic frameworks, ...
  • Rommetveit, R. (۱۹۸۵).Language acquisition as increasing linguistic structuring of experience ...
  • Samuel, M., & Stephens, D. (۲۰۰۰). Critical dialogues with self: ...
  • Scarcella, R.C., &Oxford, R.L. (۱۹۹۲).The tapestry of language learning: The ...
  • Schwartz, S. J. (۲۰۰۱). The evolution of Eriksonian and neo-Eriksonian ...
  • Seliger, H. W. (۱۹۸۳). Learner interaction in the classroom and ...
  • Serres, M. (۲۰۰۴). The Parasite (trans. Lawrence R. Schehr). Minneapolis: ...
  • Simon, R. I. (۱۹۸۸). For a pedagogy of possibility. In ...
  • Simon, R. I. (۱۹۹۵). Face to face with alterity: Postmodern ...
  • Smith, F. (۲۰۰۶).Ourselves: Why we are who we are: A ...
  • Storch, N. (۲۰۰۲). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. ...
  • Storch, N. (۲۰۰۵). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections. ...
  • Storch, N., & Wigglesowrth, G. (۲۰۱۰). Students’ engagement with feedback ...
  • Storch, N., &Wigglesworth, G. (۲۰۰۷). Writing tasks: Comparing individual and ...
  • Sullivan, P. (۱۹۹۶).Playfulness as mediation in communicative language teaching in ...
  • Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (۱۹۹۸). Interaction and second language ...
  • Toohey, K. (۲۰۰۰) Learning English at school: Identity, social relations ...
  • Villamil, O., & De Guerrero, M. C. M. (۱۹۹۶). Peer ...
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (۱۹۷۸). Mind in society. Cambridge MA: Harvard ...
  • Wells, G. (۱۹۹۸). Using L۱ to Master L۲: A response ...
  • Wertsch, J. V. (۱۹۹۱).Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach ...
  • Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (۲۰۰۹). Pair versus individual writing: ...
  • Williams, J. (۲۰۰۴). Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in ...
  • Yelland, N., & Masters, J. (۲۰۰۷).Rethinking scaffolding in the information ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع