Cognitively Complex Tasks and Individual Differences: Two Influential Factors in Iranian EFL Learners’ Written Text Quality

Publish Year: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 121

This Paper With 32 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ELT-11-23_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 10 دی 1401

Abstract:

Robinson’s Cognition Hypothesis and Skehan’s Limited Attentional Capacity Model provide the major impetus for this study. The present article reports the findings of a between-subject factorial experimental research study which explored ۱) the effects of increased cognitive task complexity, manipulated through the intentional reasoning demands and number of elements on the lexical and syntactic complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) of EFL writers’ productions; and ۲) the joint effects of cognitive task complexity factor and learners’ language learning aptitude (Low vs. High) on the written output. Firstly, we gave Carroll and Sapon’s Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT) to ۲۲۶ participants and then did a random stratification of the low- and high- aptitude learners into three groups. The participants received letter writing tasks with different cognitive complexity levels (low, medium, and high). The findings indicated that increasing cognitive task complexity resulted in significantly higher lexical and syntactic complexity and lower fluency, whereas no significant effect was found on writing accuracy. Moreover, the statistical results revealed no significant interaction effect between task complexity factors and learners’ language aptitude. With regard to the first objective of the study, the findings supported the predictions of Cognition Hypothesis while it is not the case in relation to the second objective of the study.

Authors

فرهمن فرخی

Professor of EFL, University of Tabriz

سیمین ستارپور

Assistant Professor at Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Paramedicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (۲۰۰۸). The robustness of aptitude ...
  • Carroll, J. B. (۱۹۹۳). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of ...
  • Como, L., Cronback, L. J., Kupermintz, H., Lohman, D. F., ...
  • DeKeyser, R. M. (۲۰۰۰). The robustness of critical period effects ...
  • DeKeyser, R. M. (۲۰۱۲). Interactions between Individual Differences, Treatments, and ...
  • Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (۲۰۰۵). Analyzing learner language. Oxford: ...
  • Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (۱۹۸۰). The cognition of ...
  • Ishikawa, T. (۲۰۰۶). The effect of manipulating task complexity along ...
  • Johnson, M. D. (۲۰۱۷). Cognitive task complexity and L۲ written ...
  • Kormos, J. (۲۰۱۱). Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features ...
  • Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (۲۰۰۶). Cognitive task complexity and ...
  • Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (۲۰۰۷). Task complexity and measures ...
  • Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (۲۰۰۹). Towards an organic ...
  • Petersen, C., & Al-Haik, A. (۱۹۷۶). The development of the ...
  • Robinson, P. (۲۰۰۵a). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review ...
  • Ruiz-Funes, M. (۲۰۱۴). Task complexity and linguistic performance in advanced ...
  • Skehan, P. (۲۰۰۱). Tasks and language performance assessment. In M. ...
  • Skehan, P. (۲۰۰۳). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, ۳۶, ۱–۱۴. doi: ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع