A Comparative Study of Text Formality of Applied Linguistics Articles Written in English by Iranian and Native Speaking Researchers

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 198

This Paper With 19 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_LGHOR-6-3_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 24 دی 1401

Abstract:

International scientific communication is mostly conducted in English. Consequently, writing and publishing in English is of significant importance in academic settings. Alongside many other factors, proper academic writing has an appropriate level of linguistic formality. Research has shown that linguistic features can distinguish between formal and informal texts. Different scholars have utilized different methods to define and measure formality. The present study compares the degree of formality of applied linguistics articles written in English by native English speaking and Iranian non-native English-speaking researchers by calculating their F-scores, a measure of formality introduced by Heylighen and Dewaele (۱۹۹۹). In total, ۸۰ articles were selected from four international journals. Half of them were written by Iranian non-native researchers and the other half by native researchers. The results indicated a medium level of formality in both groups. However, articles written by Iranian non-native researchers were found to have a significantly higher degree of formality. Broadly, this research has implications for teachers of English in different areas, journal editors, materials developers and researchers who want to publish internationally.

Authors

ساسان بالغی زاده

Associate Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Letters & Human Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University. Tehran, Iran

فریا اسدی

MA in TEFL, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Letters & Human Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Abdi, R. (۲۰۱۰). Projecting cultural identity through metadiscourse marking: A ...
  • Baecher, L., Farnsworth, T., & Ediger, A. (۲۰۱۴). The challenges ...
  • Bennett, K. (۲۰۰۹). English academic style manuals: A survey. Journal ...
  • Biber, D. (۱۹۹۵). Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. ...
  • Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (Eds.) (۲۰۱۹). Register, genre, and ...
  • Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J. K., & Tracy-Ventura, N. ...
  • Chang, Y. Y., & Swales, J. (۱۹۹۹). Informal elements in ...
  • Coffin, C., Curry, M., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, T., ...
  • Cohen, J. (۱۹۸۸). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences ...
  • Conrad, S., & Biber, D. (Eds.) (۲۰۰۱). Variation in English: ...
  • Constantinou, F., Chambers, L., Zanini, N., & Klir, N. (۲۰۲۰): ...
  • Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (۲۰۰۹). To what extent do ...
  • Fairclough, N. (۲۰۱۵). Language and power (۳rd ed.). Routledge ...
  • Florence Ma, L. P. (۲۰۱۲). Advantages and disadvantages of native- ...
  • Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. ...
  • Hryniuk, K. (۲۰۱۵). Linguistics research articles written in English: Comparing native ...
  • Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (۲۰۱۷). Is academic writing ...
  • Jenkins, J. (۲۰۰۳). World Englishes: A resource book for students ...
  • Jenkins, J. (۲۰۰۶). The spread of EIL: A testing time ...
  • Kim, Y. J., & Biber, D. (۱۹۹۴). A corpus-based analysis ...
  • Lahiri, S., Mitra, P., & Lu, X. (۲۰۱۱). Informality judgment ...
  • Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (۲۰۰۶). Professional academic writing ...
  • Martinez, R. (۲۰۱۸). “Specially in the last years…”: Evidence of ...
  • Moreno, A. I. (۲۰۱۰). Researching into English for research publication ...
  • Mur-Duenas, P., & Jolanta, Š. (۲۰۱۶). Self-reference in research articles ...
  • Ozturk, U., & Atay, D. (۲۰۱۰). Challenges of being a ...
  • Pavlick, E., & Tetreault, J. (۲۰۱۶). An empirical analysis of ...
  • Sardinha, T. B., & Pinto, M. V. (Eds.). (۲۰۱۴). Multi-dimensional ...
  • Seone, E., & Loureiro-Porto, L. (۲۰۰۵). On the colloquialization of ...
  • Sionis, C. (۱۹۹۵). Communication strategies in the writing of scientific ...
  • Strauss, P. (۲۰۱۷). “It’s not the way we use English”: ...
  • Tajeddin, Z., & Moghadam, A. Z. (۲۰۱۲). Interlanguage pragmatic motivation: ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع