سیویلیکا را در شبکه های اجتماعی دنبال نمایید.

The echo of Heinrich Heine’s «Bergstimme» in Russian translations of the XXth-XXIst centuries

Publish Year: 1400
Type: Journal paper
Language: English
View: 111

This Paper With 17 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

Export:

Link to this Paper:

Document National Code:

JR_RLLR-9-2_013

Index date: 15 February 2024

The echo of Heinrich Heine’s «Bergstimme» in Russian translations of the XXth-XXIst centuries abstract

The work is aimed at the comparative analysis of Russian translations of the short poem «Die Bergstimme» by Heinrich Heine. In the article the functions of linguistic means of different levels of expressing the conception of the poem are analyzed; the unique style of each translator is characterized; translators’ accomplishments and losses are pointed out. The first Russian translator of the poem, A.Ya. Kulchitsky, enhances the comic basis of the poem, emphasizing features of sentimentalism and «bestowing knighthood» to the main character. The translation by V.D. Kostomarov is full of despondency and hopelessness; moreover, the translator failed to reproduce the «echo effect». The variant by P.V. Bykov is marked by the influence of decadence and fin de siècle atmosphere. The translations of A.I. Mashistov and V.A. Zorgenfrei are equirythmic; they are characterized by the effective use of phonetic stylistic devices and restrained expression of emotions. R. Minkus overuses disharmonious consonants and exaggerates sorrows of the main character.Extended abstract:The work is aimed at the comparative analysis of Russian translations of the short poem «Die Bergstimme» («The Voice of the Mountains») by Heinrich Heine. In the article the functions of linguistic means of different levels are analyzed; the unique style of each translator is characterized; translators’ accomplishments and losses are pointed out. The methods of the investigation are: hermeneutical, comparative methods, elements of biographical, cultural-historical and comparative historical methods, linguostylistic analysis, poetological analysis, «close reading» technique. It was found out that the first Russian translator of the poem, A.Ya. Kulchitsky (1814–1845), enhances the comic basis of the poem, emphasizing features of sentimentalism and «bestowing knighthood» to the main character. While Heinrich Heine employs iambic meter with some insertion of dactylic feet, Kulchitsky refers to the use of trochee, a metre that in Russian poetic culture is associated with merriment and light-heartedness. The translation by V.D. Kostomarov (1837–1865) is full of despondency and hopelessness; moreover, the translator failed to reproduce the «echo effect». The variant by P.V. Bykov (1844–1930) is marked by the influence of decadence and fin de siècle atmosphere. The use of amphibrach makes the poem more monotonous and slow. The translations of A.I. Mashistov (1904–1987) and V.A. Zorgenfrei (1882−1938) are equirythmic; they are characterized by the effective use of phonetic stylistic devices and restrained expression of emotions. The leitmotif of Mashistov’s translation is «dream»: according to the main character, death, as well as dream, brings oblivion and peace to everyone. Zorgenfrei enriches his work with the elements of folklore style, such as lexical and synonymic repetitions, internal rhyme and folklore vocabulary. The variant of R. Minkus (1907−1986) is very close to the original poem concerning its metre and rhythm. Furthermore, her interpretation is marked with disharmonious consonants and exaggerated sorrows of the main character. In conclusion it was pointed out that for the Russian translators of the XIX century it was quite natural to change freely the metre of the original work; the notion of translation discipline wasn’t thoroughly elaborated at that time. In the XX century more accurate and faithful translation became the new norm.The work is aimed at the comparative analysis of Russian translations of the short poem «Die Bergstimme» by Heinrich Heine. In the article the functions of linguistic means of different levels of expressing the conception of the poem are analyzed; the unique style of each translator is characterized; translators’ accomplishments and losses are pointed out. The first Russian translator of the poem, A.Ya. Kulchitsky, enhances the comic basis of the poem, emphasizing features of sentimentalism and «bestowing knighthood» to the main character. The translation by V.D. Kostomarov is full of despondency and hopelessness; moreover, the translator failed to reproduce the «echo effect». The variant by P.V. Bykov is marked by the influence of decadence and fin de siècle atmosphere. The translations of A.I. Mashistov and V.A. Zorgenfrei are equirythmic; they are characterized by the effective use of phonetic stylistic devices and restrained expression of emotions. R. Minkus overuses disharmonious consonants and exaggerates sorrows of the main character. Extended abstract: The work is aimed at the comparative analysis of Russian translations of the short poem «Die Bergstimme» («The Voice of the Mountains») by Heinrich Heine. In the article the functions of linguistic means of different levels are analyzed; the unique style of each translator is characterized; translators’ accomplishments and losses are pointed out. The methods of the investigation are: hermeneutical, comparative methods, elements of biographical, cultural-historical and comparative historical methods, linguostylistic analysis, poetological analysis, «close reading» technique. It was found out that the first Russian translator of the poem, A.Ya. Kulchitsky (1814–1845), enhances the comic basis of the poem, emphasizing features of sentimentalism and «bestowing knighthood» to the main character. While Heinrich Heine employs iambic meter with some insertion of dactylic feet, Kulchitsky refers to the use of trochee, a metre that in Russian poetic culture is associated with merriment and light-heartedness. The translation by V.D. Kostomarov (1837–1865) is full of despondency and hopelessness; moreover, the translator failed to reproduce the «echo effect». The variant by P.V. Bykov (1844–1930) is marked by the influence of decadence and fin de siècle atmosphere. The use of amphibrach makes the poem more monotonous and slow. The translations of A.I. Mashistov (1904–1987) and V.A. Zorgenfrei (1882−1938) are equirythmic; they are characterized by the effective use of phonetic stylistic devices and restrained expression of emotions. The leitmotif of Mashistov’s translation is «dream»: according to the main character, death, as well as dream, brings oblivion and peace to everyone. Zorgenfrei enriches his work with the elements of folklore style, such as lexical and synonymic repetitions, internal rhyme and folklore vocabulary. The variant of R. Minkus (1907−1986) is very close to the original poem concerning its metre and rhythm. Furthermore, her interpretation is marked with disharmonious consonants and exaggerated sorrows of the main character. In conclusion it was pointed out that for the Russian translators of the XIX century it was quite natural to change freely the metre of the original work; the notion of translation discipline wasn’t thoroughly elaborated at that time. In the XX century more accurate and faithful translation became the new norm.

The echo of Heinrich Heine’s «Bergstimme» in Russian translations of the XXth-XXIst centuries Keywords:

The echo of Heinrich Heine’s «Bergstimme» in Russian translations of the XXth-XXIst centuries authors

Kuzmina Aleksandra Viktorovna

Postgraduate student, Donetsk National University, Donetsk, Russia

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
- Гейне Г. (1840). Горнее эхо (пер. Кульчицкий А. Я.) ...
- Гейне Г. (1860). Горные голоса (пер. Костомаров В. Д.) ...
- Гейне Г. (1904). Горный голос (пер. Быков П. В.) ...
- Гейне Г. (1956). Горный голос (пер. Зоргенфрей В. А.) ...
- Гейне Г. (1961). Горный голос (пер. Машистов А.И.) // ...
- Гейне Г. (1980). Горный голос (пер. Минкус Р.) // ...
- Дейч А. И. (1963). Поэтический мир Генриха Гейне. – ...
- Зайцев В. А. (1934). Полное собрание сочинений Генриха Гейне ...
- Инберг В. (2018). Свет и воздух Одессы // Мигдаль ...
- Кузнецов С. А. (2000). Большой толковый словарь русского языка. ...
- Куликова Ю. С. (2011). Влияние личности переводчика на перевод ...
- Маршак С. Я. (1971). Почерк века, почерк поколения // ...
- Писарев Д. И. (1894). Вольные русские переводчики // Сочинения ...
- Полякова Ю. Ю. (2007). Александр Кульчицкий: личность и судьба ...
- Пронин В. А. (2011). Поэзия Генриха Гейне: генезис и ...
- Раух К. (2008). Семья Минкус-Нудельман в доме Блещунова // ...
- Gejne G. (1840). Gornee jeho (per. Kul'chickij A. Ja.) ...
- Gejne G. (1860). Gornye golosa (per. Kostomarov V. D.) ...
- Gejne G. (1904). Gornyj golos (per. Bykov P. V.) ...
- Gejne G. (1956). Gornyj golos (per. Zorgenfrej V. A.) ...
- Gejne G. (1961). Gornyj golos (per. Mashistov A.I.) // ...
- Gejne G. (1980). Gornyj golos (per. Minkus R.) // ...
- Dejch A. I. (1963). Pojeticheskij mir Genriha Gejne. – ...
- Zajcev V. A. (1934). Polnoe sobranie sochinenij Genriha Gejne ...
- Inberg V. (2018). Svet i vozduh Odessy // Migdal' ...
- Kuznecov S. A. (2000). Bol'shoj tolkovyj slovar' russkogo jazyka. ...
- Kulikova Ju. S. (2011). Vlijanie lichnosti perevodchika na perevod ...
- Marshak S. Ja. (1971). Pocherk veka, pocherk pokolenija // ...
- Pisarev D. I. (1894). Vol'nye russkie perevodchiki // Sochinenija ...
- Poljakova Ju. Ju. (2007). Aleksandr Kul'chickij: lichnost' i sud'ba ...
- Pronin V. A. (2011). Pojezija Genriha Gejne: genezis i ...
- Rauh K. (2008). Sem'ja Minkus-Nudel'man v dome Bleshhunova // ...
نمایش کامل مراجع