سیویلیکا را در شبکه های اجتماعی دنبال نمایید.

Comparing the Effectiveness of Mindfulness Meta-Cognitive Therapy vs Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in People With General Anxiety Disorder

Publish Year: 1403
Type: Journal paper
Language: English
View: 162

This Paper With 14 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

Export:

Link to this Paper:

Document National Code:

JR_JPCP-12-2_002

Index date: 28 April 2024

Comparing the Effectiveness of Mindfulness Meta-Cognitive Therapy vs Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in People With General Anxiety Disorder abstract

Objective: This study compares the effectiveness of mindfulness meta-cognitive therapy and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on experiential avoidance, negative strategies of cognitive emotion regulation, and emotional processing in people with general anxiety disorder (GAD). Methods: This was a semi-experimental research with experimental and control groups. A total of 45 patients with GAD were selected using the purposeful sampling method. One group received 8 sessions of mindfulness meta-cognitive therapy (one session per week), and another group received 15 sessions of tDCS (three sessions per week; each session was 20 min in F3/F4 with an intensity of 2 mA). All subjects in two treatment groups and one waitlist control group were evaluated before and after the treatment using an acceptance and action questionnaire, cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire, and emotional processing scale. The data were analyzed by multivariate analysis of covariance and the Tukey test. The data were analyzed using the SPSS software, version 19.  Results: The results showed that tDCS and mindfulness meta-cognitive therapy are effective in experiential avoidance (F=98.53, η2=0.744), negative strategies for cognitive emotion regulation (F=102.26, η2=0.824), and emotional processing (F=121.26, η2=0.931) in people with GAD. There is no significant difference in the experiential avoidance variable (md=0.735, P=0.575) and emotional processing (md=0.731, P=0.134) between mindfulness meta-cognitive therapy and tDCS therapy; however, in the rumination subscale, only mindfulness meta-cognitive therapy treatment method has been effective in the variable of negative strategies of cognitive emotion regulation (md=4.63, P=0.008). Conclusion: tDCS and mindfulness meta-cognitive therapy were both effective in improving GAD symptoms, but mindfulness meta-cognitive therapy had more effects on clients’ rumination. As a result, to control the negative strategies for cognitive emotion regulation, mindfulness meta-cognitive therapy has a better effect.

Comparing the Effectiveness of Mindfulness Meta-Cognitive Therapy vs Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in People With General Anxiety Disorder Keywords:

Meta-cognitive therapy , Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) , Mindfulness , Experiential avoidance , Cognitive emotion regulation , Emotional processing , General anxiety disorder (GAD)

Comparing the Effectiveness of Mindfulness Meta-Cognitive Therapy vs Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in People With General Anxiety Disorder authors

Nastaran Mohajeri Aval

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran.

Mohammad Narimani

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran.

Goodarz Sadeghi

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran.

Nader Hajloo

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
Abasi, E., Fti, L., Molodi, R., & Zarabi, H. (۲۰۱۲). ...
Bar-Haim, Y., Morag, I., & Glickman, S. (۲۰۱۱). Training anxious ...
Fregni, F., Boggio, P. S., Nitsche, M., Bermpohl, F., Antal, ...
Hasani, J. (۲۰۱۰). [Examining the reliability and validity of the ...
Heeren, A., Billieux, J., Philippot, P., De Raedt, R., Baeken, ...
Hoffart, A., Johnson, S, U., Nordahl, H, M., & Wells, ...
Jacobs, N., Kleen, M., De Groot, F., & A-Tjak, J. ...
Martin, D. M., Liu, R., Alonzo, A., Green, M., Player, ...
Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (۲۰۰۵). The cognitive ...
Ollendick, T. H., & Hirshfeld-Becker, D. R. (۲۰۰۲). The developmental ...
Polanía, R., Paulus, W., & Nitsche, M. A. (۲۰۱۲). Modulating ...
Rabie, M., Zerehposh, A., Palahang, H., & Zarei, H. (۲۰۱۳). ...
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, ...
Vicario, C. M., Salehinejad, M. A., Felmingham, K., Martino, G., ...
نمایش کامل مراجع