The importance of endometrial nerve fibers and macrophage cell count in the diagnosis of endometriosis

Publish Year: 1392
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 328

This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJRM-11-5_008

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 16 شهریور 1395

Abstract:

Background: Endometriosis is a disease that is hard to diagnose without the gold standard method, laparoscopy. An easier diagnostic method is needed. Objective: The aim of the study is to determine whether the number of macrophage cells in the endometrium and/or the detection of nerve fibers can be used in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Materials and Methods: Endometrial sampling was done to 31 patients prior to laparoscopy (L/S) or laparotomy (L/T) at Istanbul University Istanbul School of Medicine Hospital between January 2010 February 2011. Also 34 patients who were retrospectively chosen from their files were added to the study. 5 patients were excluded from the study. Totally, 31 patients were placed in the endometriosis and 29 patients in the control group. Endometrial samples were evaluated immunohistochemically with the markers protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5) and neurofilament (NF) for nerve fibers and CD68 for macrophages. Results: None of the samples were stained with PGP 9.5 and NF. As for CD68+cells, no statistically significant difference was observed between groups (endometriosis: 216.10±104.41; control: 175.93±43.05, p=0.06). Results were also evaluated in the subgroups of menstruel phases and disease stages. Only in the proliferative phase there was a significant increase in the endometriosis group (p=0.03). No significant difference was observed between the stages. Conclusion: The detection of nerve fibers in the eutopic endometrium with the markers of PGP 9.5 and NF is not found to be helpful in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Macrophage cells may be helpful in the diagnosis only in the proliferative phase.

Authors

Cihan Cetin

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

hasan serdaroglu

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Unit, Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

sitki tuzlali

Department of Pathology, Gynecopathology Unit, Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey