Responsibility audits are a management tool for demonstrating the potential qualitative and financial benefits

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 428

This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ICMSCONF01_117

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 26 شهریور 1395

Abstract:

Managers are traditionally reluctant to implement responsibility performance measures, fearing that good social performance may negatively affect financial performance. Yet example after example demonstrates that operating responsibly saves money and, in some cases, even creates profitable new opportunities. The payback to the audited companies that we studied was between six and twenty times the audit cost over periods of 6 months to 3 years. The companies consistently found that interacting responsibly with their primary stakeholders caused them to operate more responsibly and more profitably. They direct managers’ attention to socially responsible practices that meet the expectations of primary stakeholders. Achieving the benefits rests on creating an adaptive and proactive corporate culture from the top down. Such proactive management helps avoid normally hidden costs and liabilities that come from reacting to problems as they occur. Moreover, operating responsibly is — or can be — a core business strategy, one in which core operating functions is considered strategic, and stakeholder relationships and financial performance is allowed to grow.In this study we propose that auditing a company’s core operating practices by using a responsibility audit may help to bridge this rhetoric-reality gap. Such an audit assesses a company’s overall performance against its core values, ethics policy, internal operating practices, and management systems. Eight Companies assessed those operating practices that related to implementing their stated vision, values, and mission. All eight had award-winning environmental, health, and safety (EHS); human resources; or corporate giving practices. However, they all discovered significant gaps in four operating areas: employee relations, quality systems, community relations, and environmental practices.

Authors

Romina Rabani

Executive Master of Business Administration

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • C. Fombrun, Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image (Boston: ...
  • Charles. Derber, Corporation Nation St. Martin's Press, 2014. ...
  • _ Fisher and W.R. Torbert, Personal and Organizationa l Transfo ...
  • E.M. Burke, Corporate Community Relations: The Principle of the Neighbor ...
  • Evidence on the Cost of Being Socially Responsible in Additional:ه ...
  • J.B. Guerard Jr., _ There a Cost to Being Socially ...
  • J. Entine, "The Body Shop: Truth Or Consequences, _ Drug ...
  • Jim, Collins and Jerry. I. Porras, Built to Last: Successful ...
  • J.J. Angel and P. Rivoli, "Does Ethical Investing Impose a ...
  • L. Kurtz, "No Effect, or No Net Effect? Studies On ...
  • R.Edward. Freeman, Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach, Cambridge university press, ...
  • Sandra waddock, Making a Difference: Corporate Responsibility as a Social ...
  • S.A. Waddock and S.B. Graves, "Quality of Management and Quality ...
  • S.A. Waddock and S.B. Graves, "The Corporate Social Performanc e-Financial ...
  • S. Lydenberg and K. Paul, "Stakeholder Theory and Sociallly Responsible ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع