An Investigation of Stance Metadiscourse Markers in English Book Reviews of Soft Disciplines
Publish place: International Conference on New Research Findings in Science, Engineering and Technology with a Focus on Need-Based Research
Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 611
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
ICMRS01_080
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 8 آبان 1395
Abstract:
The present study intended to investigate the use of stance metadiscourse markers in academic book reviews. To this end a sample of 51 book reviews from three soft disciplines including linguistics, Psychology, Sociology was compiled. All the book reviews were published in Scopus. For classification and analysis of the stance metadiscourse markers used, Hyland's (2005) model of stance was employed. It was found that boosters were the most frequently used stance markers with 42.21%. The result indicated the important role of stance markers in book reviews of soft discipline. The results of a Chi-Square test showed that there is a significant difference among English book reviews of soft disciplines in the use of stance discourse markers. The field of linguistics (39.33%) was found to make use of the stance markers more than Psychology and Sociology.
Keywords:
Authors
Neda Zal
MA student of TEFL, University of Kashan
Mohammad Raouf Moini
Associate Professor, University of Kashan
Faeze Shahdostfard
phD chemistry student, Ilam University
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :