A Comprehensive Critique of Postmethod Era and Postmethod Pedagogy

To write a comprehensive critique on postmethod era, first, we referred to Kumaravadivelu who is truly considered as one of the founders of postmethod era. To start his critique of method, Kumaravadivelu ( 2006, p.165) reminds us that all the established methods are based on the theoretical insights derived almost exclusively from a Western knowledge , and quotes the expression the death of the method from Allwright s (1991). Then he introduces a three-dimensional system consisting of three pedagogic parameters and explains that each parameter shapes and is shaped by the others and believes they interweave and interact with each other in a synergic relationship where the whole is much more than the sum of its parts. He argued that particularity, practicality, and possibility are the three pedagogic parameters of any postmethod pedagogy.Secondly, we presented two critiques on the subject, and next, we considered the TEFL programs in Iran. Finally, focusing on some outstanding notions derived from the postmethod pedagogy, we elaborated on our own viewpoint on postmethod era and pedagogy, which is the considerable drawback with inadequate, incompetent postmethod teacher educators worldwide. Next, presenting some related superior notions about learning based on the Islamic theories and education, generally taken from the Verses of Holy Qur an and Traditions, we suggest that such societies can enhance the process of learning and language