Impact of Grouping Type in Descriptve Collaborative Writings on Iranian EFL Learners' Written Grammatical Accuracy

Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 161

This Paper With 16 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JFL-9-34_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 9 مرداد 1400

Abstract:

The current study was an attempt to investigate the impact of grouping type on the grammatical accuracy of Iranian EFL learners in collaborative writing. Through administering the Michigan Test of English Language Proficiency, ۶۴ female university students available participated in this study and were assigned to two groups--heterogeneous and homogeneous. The treatment process lasted ۱۲ weeks of collaborative writing and revising, with emphesis on the development of the the participants’ written grammatical accuracy. They were pretested and posttested through a descriptive free writing measure. The results revealed that the participants in both groups had higher posttest scores. Using ANCOVA, it was found that there was a differential effect of grouping type on the grammatical accuracy of homogeneous and heterogeneous pairs, indicating that the participants in heterogeneous group had significantly higher posttest scores than those in homogeneous group. Furthermore, although the grammatical accuracy of both groups increased, a significant difference was observed between them, revealing that the participants in heterogeneous group outperformed those in homogeneous group. The findings of this study can be interpreted in terms of the sociocultural theory and Vygotsky’s idea of the zone of proximal development.

Authors

Hossein Mohammadzadeh

Department of English Language Teaching, Tabriz Branch , Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.

Nasser Ghafoori

Department of English Language Teaching, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

Mahnaz Saeidi

Department of English Language Teaching, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Adams, D., & Hamm, M. (۱۹۹۶). Cooperative learning: Critical thinking ...
  • Adodo, S. O., & Agbayewa, J. O. (۲۰۱۱). Effect of ...
  • Allwright, D. (۲۰۱۴). Observation in the language classroom. Abingdon: Routledge ...
  • Baer, J. (۲۰۰۳). Grouping and Achievement in Cooperative Learning. College ...
  • Cady, J. L. (۲۰۱۱). The Effects of implementing heterogeneous writing ...
  • Ghanbari, N., & Ghaffar Samar, R. ( ۲۰۱۶). Grouping Strategies ...
  • Cooper, J., Prescott, S., Cook, L., Smith, L., Mueck, R ...
  • Donato ,R. (۱۹۹۴). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In ...
  • Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (۱۹۸۶). “Information Gap” Tasks: Do ...
  • Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (۲۰۱۳). Focus on form in ...
  • Ellis, N. C. (۲۰۱۳). Second language acquisition. In The Routledge ...
  • Fauziah,H.,& Latief, M.,(۲۰۱۵). The effect of working in heterogeneous and ...
  • Heidar, D. M. (۲۰۱۶). ZPD-assisted intervention via web ۲.۰ and ...
  • Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (۱۹۹۴). An overview of cooperative ...
  • Kian-sam, H. (۱۹۹۹). Cooperative CBI: The effects of heterogeneous versus ...
  • Kowal, M., & Swain ,M. (۱۹۹۴). Using collaborative language production ...
  • Kowal, M. and Swain, M. (۱۹۹۷) From semantic to syntactic ...
  • Kruse, A. J. (۲۰۱۱). Proceedings from CIED ۵۰۰ principle of ...
  • Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (۲۰۰۲). The effect of interaction ...
  • Leeser, M. J. (۲۰۰۴) Learner proficiency and focus on form ...
  • Lightbown, P., & Spada ,N. (۱۹۹۹). How languages are learned ...
  • Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (۱۹۹۵). Analyzing Talk in ESL ...
  • Mahenthiran, S & ,.Rouse, P. J. (۲۰۰۰). The impact of ...
  • Pishghadam, R., & Ghardiri, S. (۲۰۱۱). Symmetrical or asymmetrical scaffolding: ...
  • Slavin, R. E. (۱۹۹۵). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice, ...
  • Spector, J. M., Ifenthaler, D., Samspon, D., Yang, L., Mukama, ...
  • Stone, C.A. (۱۹۹۳) What is missing in the metaphor of ...
  • Storch, N. (۱۹۹۹). Are two heads better than one? Pair ...
  • Storch, N. (۲۰۰۱). How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary ...
  • Storch, N. (۲۰۰۲a). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. ...
  • Storch, N. (۲۰۰۷). Investigating the merits of pair work on ...
  • Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (۲۰۰۷). Writing tasks: The effects ...
  • Swain, M. (۲۰۰۱) Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification ...
  • Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (۲۰۰۲) Talking it through: Two ...
  • Van Lier, L. (۲۰۱۴). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, ...
  • Villamil, O. S., & de Guerrero, M. C. (۱۹۹۶). Peer ...
  • Vygotsky, L. (۱۹۷۸). Mind in society: The development of higher ...
  • Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (۲۰۰۷). Effects of proficiency differences ...
  • Webb, N. M. (۱۹۸۹). Peer interaction and learning in small ...
  • Zamani., M. (۲۰۱۶). Cooperative learning: Homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping of ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع