A critical study on the newest model of perfectionism
Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 99
This Paper With 5 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_BEHAVS-9-3_001
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 28 مرداد 1402
Abstract:
Introduction: The ۲×۲ model is the newest model of perfectionism that has been raised several hypotheses about the compatibility’s level of different types of perfectionism. The main aim of this study is to test these hypotheses.Methods: A hundred and ninety eight MA students were selected through a cluster random sampling and were divided into four groups based on perfectionism’s types with Hill perfectionism as a screening test. Afterwards, these four groups were compared using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) in terms of the components of general health and two personality characteristics (Neuroticism and Conscientiousness) to test the ۲×۲ model hypotheses.Results: Hypothesis۱c and hypothesis ۴ of the ۲×۲ model of perfectionism were accepted. This is was while the hypothesis ۲ and hypothesis ۳ were not accepted because the results of the research showed the mixed perfectionism is more maladaptive compared to the other combinations of ECP and PSP.Conclusion: It seems that the perfectionism tests -especially the Hill perfectionism inventory- are not able to measure the absolute adaptive perfectionism. Therefore, the main suggestion of the research is that future researchers may try to understand the characteristics of adaptive perfectionism and design the test that can measure the quite adaptive perfectionism.
Keywords:
Authors
Hoda Purrezaian
Department of Health Psychology, Faulty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
Mehdi Purrezaian
Department of Psychology, Faulty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
Mahmood Golzari
Department of Psychology, Faulty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran
Ahmad Borjali
Department of Psychology, Faulty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :