Natural language processing systems for diagnosing and determining level of lung cancer: A systematic review

Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 127

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

این Paper در بخشهای موضوعی زیر دسته بندی شده است:

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJIMI-10-1_011

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 30 مرداد 1401

Abstract:

Introduction: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer for men and women. Using natural language processing to automatically extract information from text, lead to decrease labor of manual extraction from large volume of text material and save time. The aim of this study is to systematically review of studies which reviewed NLP methods in diagnosing and staging lung cancer.Material and Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, Embase was searched for English language articles that reported diagnosing and staging methods in lung cancer Using NLP until DEC ۲۰۱۹. Two reviewers independently assessed original papers to determine eligibility for inclusion in the review.Results: Of ۲۳۱ studies, ۷ studies were included. Three studies developed a NLP algorithm to scan radiology notes and determine the presence or absence of nodules to identify patients with incident lung nodules for treatment or follow-up. Two studies used NLP to transform the report text, including identification of UMLS terms and detection of negated findings to classifying reports, also one of them used an SVM-based text classification system for staging lung cancer patients. All studies reported various performance measures based on the difference between combinations of methods. Most of studies have reported sensitivity and specificity of the NLP algorithm for identifying the presence of lung nodules.Conclusion: Evaluation of studies in diagnosing and staging methods in lung cancer using NLP shows there is a number of studies on diagnosing lung cancer but there are a few works on staging that. In some studies, combination of methods was considered and NLP isolated was not sufficient for capturing satisfying results. There are potentials to improve studies by adding other data sources, further refinement and subsequent validation.

Authors

Mahdieh Montazeri

Medical Informatics Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Ali Afraz

Medical Informatics Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Raheleh Mahboob Farimani

Department of Health Information Sciences, Faculty of Management and Medical Information Sciences, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Fahimeh Ghasemian

Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran