Investigating Rater effect on Foreign Language Writing Performance Using Bi-factor Analysis

Publish Year: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 537

This Paper With 19 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELSCONF04_177

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 خرداد 1396

Abstract:

The current study intends to investigate what influence, if any, rater as a construct irrelevant factor has on foreign language writing test results. Specifically, this study focused on self, peer and teacher raters.The participants were 200 non-native English speakers majoring in English literature and Englishtranslation at an Iranian university. The students were asked to complete a writing task, for completing which they were asked to write on a given subject based on their own experiences. Then, the completedtest task was rated by self, peer and teacher raters based on an analytical scoring rubric. Finally bifactorstructural equation modeling using IMB SPSS AMOS22 software was used to analyze the data. As the next step, fit indices attached to the proposed model were explored. A perfect fit of the model to the data was found, therefore it was revealed that both general (writing) and domain specific factors(self, peer and teacher raters) affect performance in a foreign language writing test. To understandwhether the effect of general factor (students’ writing performance ability) was higher or the effect of domain specific factors (self, peer and teacher raters), item loadings were explored. Each of the threedomain specific factor loadings were higher than factor loadings of the general factor, writing. Theresults indicated that the effect of rater as a construct irrelevant factor on test takers’ foreign language writing performance was much greater than their writing performance ability. The attempt to describe the relationships among the variables certainly extended our understanding ofthe effect of construct irrelevant factors on foreign language writing by concluding that raters affect foreign language writing performance. The current study also provides support for usefulness of SEM approach in exploring issues related to foreign language writing tests. The results of this study will provide recommendations to anyone involved in language assessment, theoretical or practical

Authors

Hamdollah Ravand

Vali-e-Asr university of Rafsanjan and Jiroft University

Sahar AbbasiSardari

Vali-e-Asr university of Rafsanjan

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Angelova, M. (1999). An exploratory study of factors affecting the ...
  • Aryadoust, V. (2010). Investigating Writing Sub-skills in Testing English as ...
  • Aryadoust, V., Akbarzadeh, S., & Nasiri, E. (2007). IELTS writing ...
  • Association, A. P., & Education, N. C. o. M. i. ...
  • Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental consideration in language testing: Oxford ...
  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1982). The Construct ...
  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1989). The construct ...
  • Banerjee, J., Franceschina, F., & Smith, A. M. (2007). Documenting ...
  • Barkaoui, K. (2010). Variability in ESL essay rating processes: The ...
  • Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C.-P. (1987). Practical issues in ...
  • Birjandi, P., & Hadidi Tamjid, N. (2012). The role of ...
  • Blue, G. M. (1994). S elf-Assessmet of Foreign Language Skills: ...
  • Brooks, K. (1957). The construction and testing of a forced ...
  • Brown, A. (2005). S elf-assessmet of writing in independent language ...
  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number ...
  • Chen, Y.-M. (2008). Learning to self-assess oral performance in English: ...
  • Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language ...
  • Cumming, A. (1990). Expertise in evaluating second language compositions. Language ...
  • Elder, C., Knoch, U., Barkhuizen, G., & von Randow, J. ...
  • Esfandiari, R., & Myford, C. M. (2013). Severity differences among ...
  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & ...
  • Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in ...
  • Farhady, H., & Hedayati, H. (2009). Language assessment policy in ...
  • Farrokhi, F., Esfandiari, R., & Schaefer, E. (2012). A many-facet ...
  • Freeman, M. (1995). Peer assessment by groups of group work. ...
  • Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. ...
  • Goldfinch, J., & Raeside, R. (1990). Development of a peer ...
  • Hargreaves, A., Earl, L, & Schmidt, M. (2002). Perspectives on ...
  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the ...
  • Jiliang, C., & Kun, W. (2007). An investigation of scorer ...
  • Johnson, J. S., & Lim, G. S. (2009). The influence ...
  • Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring ...
  • Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to ...
  • Knoch, U. (2011). Investigating the effectiveness of individualized feedback to ...
  • Koizumi, R. (2015). Task and rater effects in L2 speaking ...
  • Kondo-Brown, K. (2002). A FACETS analysis of rater bias in ...
  • Kwan, K. P., & Leung, R. W. (1996). Tutor versus ...
  • Lim, G. S. (2011). The development and maintenance of rating ...
  • L inddb lom-ylanne, S., Pihlajamaki, H., & Kotkas, T. (2006). ...
  • Lumley, T., & McNamara, T. F. (1995). Rater characteristics and ...
  • Matsuno, S. (2009). Self-, peer-, and teacher-asse ssments in Japanese ...
  • McIntyre, P. N. (1993). The importance and effectiveness of moderation ...
  • McLaren, P. (1998). Life in Schools. An Introduction to Critical ...
  • McNamara, T. F. (1996). Measuring second language performance: Addison Wesley ...
  • Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation The ...
  • Messick, S. (1990). Validity of test interpretation and use. ...
  • Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (1996). The importance ...
  • Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2009). Best practices ...
  • Oscarson, M. (1989). S elf-assessmet of language proficiency: Rationale and ...
  • Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survivat manual: McGraw-Hil Education (UK). ...
  • Peden, B. F., & Carroll, D. W. (2008). Ways of ...
  • Percival, F., & Ellington, H. (1984). Handbook of Educationl Methodology: ...
  • Revelle, W., & Rocklin, T. (1979). Very simple structure: An ...
  • Ross, J. A., & Starling, M. (2008). Self-as sessment in ...
  • Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing atfairness: How our ...
  • Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004). Characteristics and user acceptance ...
  • Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2009). Peer-assessing peers' contribution o ...
  • Shaw, S., & Falvey, P. (2008). The IELTS writing assessment ...
  • Shohamy, E., Gordon, C. M., & Kraemer, R. (1992). The ...
  • Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and ...
  • Topping, K. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into practice, 48(1), 20-27. ...
  • Topping, K. (2010). Peers as a source of formative assessment. ...
  • Wangsotorn, _ (1981). S elf-assessmet in English skills by undergraduate ...
  • Weigle, S. C. (1994). Effects of training on raters of ...
  • Wiggins, G. P. (1993). Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose ...
  • Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع